Laserfiche WebLink
ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED FOR A SUMMARY OF THE DOCUMENTS AND <br />TO HAVE THE DIFFERENCES POINTED OUT. <br />MR. GHITO REPORTED THAT THE JOINT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY <br />COVERS THE ENTIRE AREA, AND THE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY IS FOR <br />THOSE SPECIAL AREAS WHERE THERE MIGHT BE A PROBLEM NOW THAT THE COUNTY <br />WOULD WANT TO SOLVE. <br />THE ATTORNEY STATED THE MEMO TO THE COMMISSIONERS SETS OUT <br />COST LIMITATIONS AND ASKED WHERE THEY APPEAR IN THE AGREEMENTS. <br />MR. GHITO ADVISED THERE IS A SUPPLEMENT #1 TO THE CONTRACT; <br />THE CONTRACT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THEM TO DO ANYTHING - THE SUPPLEMENTS <br />GIVE THEM THIS AUTHORITY. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ADDED THAT ENCLOSURE #2 IS <br />SUPPLEMENT #1. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT ARTICLE 3.2 CONCERNING THE 2.15 <br />MULTIPLIER. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT SUPPLEMENT #1 DOES NOT APPLY <br />TO THE FINAL REPORT, JUST TO PHASE 1, AND THAT THE ENGINEERS WILL BE <br />COMING BACK FOR ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS LATER ON. HE ADDED THAT <br />SUPPLEMENT 1 AND 2 APPLY STRICTLY TO PHASE 1 AND THE AERIAL PHOTO- <br />GRAMMETRY AND DO NOT DEAL WITH THE FINAL REPORT. <br />MR. GHITO AFFIRMED THAT THEY WOULD BE BACK AT A LATER TIME <br />FOR SUPPLEMENT 3. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE OTHER CONSULTANTS HAVE BROKEN <br />DOWN THEIR PERSONNEL CHARGES IN VARIOUS CATEGORIES)AND HE NOTICED <br />THEIR FIRM HAS NOT DONE THIS. <br />MR, GHITO EXPLAINED THEY WOULD BE CHARGING THE COUNTY THE <br />SALARY OF THE INDIVIDUAL THAT HAS WORKED THAT HOUR AS OPPOSED TO <br />WORKING WITH SOME KIND OF A SCHEDULE, IN OTHER WORDS, THE INDIVIDUAL <br />WHO ACTUALLY PUTS IN THAT HOUR OF WORK, THE COUNTY WOULD PAY HIS SALARY, <br />PLUS THE MULTIPLIER. <br />MR. BOCHIARDY ADVISED THEY HAVE ALL THEIR PERSONNEL CATEGO- <br />RIZED ACCORDING TO CLASSIFICATION AND WOULD BE HAPPY TO FURNISH THE <br />BOARD THIS INFORMATION. <br />0 <br />17 <br />MAR 19 1980 - - - - <br />BOOK 3- FAE 17 <br />