3/19/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS REFERRED TO ARTICLE 9, REUSE OF DOCUMENTS, AND SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY MIGHT WANT REPRODUCIBLES OF THOSE DOCUMENTS. HE INQUIRED THAT IF THE COUNTY WANTED TO ORDER ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHS, WOULD THERE BE A FIXED PRICE? THE ADMINISTRATOR FELT THE PHOTOGRAPHS CANNOT BE SOLD BY THE COMPANY THAT MADE THEM WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE COUNTY. MR. GHITO THOUGHT THAT OBTAINING PERMISSION FROM THE COUNTY TO SELL THE PHOTOGRAPHS COULD BE SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT. ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS NOTED THAT SOMETHING MIGHT ARISE WHERE THE COUNTY WOULD WANT TO BUY ADDITIONAL FULL SIZE PHOTOGRAPHS FOR ANOTHER USE, AND WONDERED IF THAT COULD BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT, AT A FIXED PRICE. MR. BOCHIARDY FELT THERE MIGHT BE A PROBLEM WITH LOCKING IN A PRICE FOR AN. INDEFINITE PERIOD OF TIME. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY REALLY SHOULD OWN THE NEGATIVES. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STRONGLY FELT THAT THE COUNTY SHOULD KNOW WHAT THE PHOTOGRAPHS ARE GOING TO COST THEM SOMETIME IN THE FUTURE. HE IS CONCERNED THAT THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MIGHT NOT BE FAMILIAR WITH WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT NOW AND FELT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT ON THE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS FOR THE COUNTY, THAT THE COUNTY CAN OBTAIN ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHS WHEN THEY WANT THEM, AT A FIXED PRICE. THE ADMINISTRATOR CONTINUED THAT HE WAS THINKING STRICTLY OF THE COUNTY'S NEEDS IN CASE THEY WOULD AUTHORIZE ANOTHER ENGINEERING FIRM AND NEEDED CERTAIN PRINTS, HE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO SAY THAT THE COUNTY CAN GET THAT PRINT FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF MONEY. HE FELT THAT IS AN ADVANTAGE TO THE COUNTY, AND NOT UNFAIR TO THE COMPANY MAKING THE PHOTOGRAPHS. MR. BOCHIARDY THOUGHT THAT MAY BE A PROBLEM BUT IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN A DUPLICATE SET OF NEGATIVES; THEY ALL WOULD HAVE TO ARRIVE AT AN EQUITABLE SOLUTION. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER DEESON, THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE u 19 43`racE 1� MAR 19198Q L _