Laserfiche WebLink
MAR 19-1980 gppK 43 PACE 58, <br />March 6, 1980 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Jack G. Jennings <br />County Administrator <br />SUBJ.: Traffic Signal Modification and Installation <br />On February 14, 1980, we received three letters from the <br />Department of Transportation responding to our request for authoriza- <br />tion to modify and install certain traffic signals. <br />The first concerned the relocation of a pedestrian traffic <br />control signal on U.S.1 from just south of North Gifford Road to the <br />actual intersection (enclosure 1). <br />Their recommendation was to remove the control device. They <br />further stated that their review of current traffic volumes indicated <br />a traffic signal was warranted, however, installation would have to <br />be borne by the county. Signal Construction Company estimates the cost <br />of removal of the pedestrian crossing light and the installation of a <br />new traffic signal would be $19,000.00 (see enclosure 2). <br />The second letter at enclosure 3 concerns the light at SR -5 <br />(U.S.1) and 12th Street. We had requested a study to determine if <br />an exclusive left turn signal needed to be added. Their analysis <br />indicated that this was not required. They further pointed out a <br />shortage of signal heads at that location and recommended installation. <br />Signal Construction Company recommended the addition of two one-way <br />three section signal heads to achieve MUTCD standards. They did not <br />agree with DOT assessment that an exclusive left turn signal was not <br />required. They recommended that we ask DOT to restudy this location <br />on the basis of potential danger and increased volumes as well as a <br />more up-to-date accident history. Their estimate of the cost of <br />additional signal heads was $900.00 (enclosure 4). <br />The third letter (enclosure 5) approved our request to replace <br />the flasher at SR -60 and Kings Highway with a fully actuated traffic <br />signal. Again, the costs would have to be borne by the county. <br />Signal -Construction Company estimates the cost to be $22,000100 <br />for this change-fenclosure 6). <br />It is recommended that: <br />1. The cuxrent pedestrian traffic control signal on U.S.1 <br />and North Gifford Road be removed. <br />2. We do not replace this with a fully actuated signal at <br />this time. <br />3. Two (2) one-way three section signal heads be added to <br />the traffic signal system at U.S.1 and 12th Street. <br />4. We ask DOT to restudy this location in an attempt to <br />justify a left turn signal. <br />5. We replace the flasher with a fully actuated signal at <br />SR -60 and Kings Highway. <br />ENCLOSURE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST <br />