Laserfiche WebLink
THE ATTORNEY EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THAT THE DOCUMENTS <br />WERE JUST PONY -EXPRESSED TO THE COUNTY YESTERDAY AFTERNOON AND THAT <br />IS WHY THE BOARD DOES NOT HAVE COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS. HE THEN <br />REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WITH THE BOARD: <br />1. INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE <br />2. PUBLIC MEETINGS CERTIFICATE <br />3. SIGNATURE AND NO LITIGATION CERTIFICATE <br />4. CERTIFICATE AS TO OFFICIAL STATEMENT <br />5. NON -ARBITRAGE CERTIFICATE <br />6. CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY AND PAYMENT <br />7. RECEIPT OF BONDS <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT THE COMMISSIONERS APPROVE THE EXECUTION <br />OF THE DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATE PERSONS TO SIGN. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE EXECUTION OF THE ABOVE-NAMED <br />DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURES OF THE APPROPRIATE PERSONS• <br />THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON MOTION MADE, SECONDED <br />AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT IO:OO O'CLOCK A.M. <br />ATTEST: <br />CLERK 'CHAIRMAN <br />9 <br />BOW( 43 PAGE 143 <br />