Laserfiche WebLink
developers to provide connectivity, and a developer's agreement for six lanes. While <br />working on the Developer's Agreement; however, a problem arose whereby improving a <br />portion of US -1 to accommodate more developments it would cause other portions to <br />break. He told the Board they undertook an Arterial analysis, and saw there was a need for <br />the Board to accept new service level volumes. He provided brief information on <br />ARTPLAN software and Synchro software programs that provide links or segments to <br />specific volumes at level of service. <br />Director Keating explained that Staffs recommendation was not to adopt the amendment <br />when it returns from the Department of Community Affairs, because it relates to the <br />Proportionate Share Mitigation. He provided an example. Staff recommended that the Board <br />accept Synchro analysis results, direct staff to apply Synchro capacities to the concurrency <br />system, and agree not to adopt the pending Comprehensive Plan amendment when it comes <br />back from DCA, and to direct staff to initiate the process of preparing a State Environmental <br />Impact Report for 6-laning US -1. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Chris Mora explained the difference between the <br />two plans. <br />Bryan Good, Consultant, Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. explained the process <br />used in analyzing the time allotted at each signal. <br />Chairman Wheeler wanted to ensure what they were doing was positive. <br />Discussion ensued among the Commissioners regarding traffic timing, and <br />synchronizing volume. <br />Administrator Baird advised the Board that their decision today would not speed up <br />the road improvements. He felt that as they go through the phases of proceeding with the plan <br />analysis, buy right-of-way, and look for stormwater runoff, and while they are doing that he felt <br />July 17, 2007 21 <br />