Laserfiche WebLink
5.- 1r.. Childera-has not maintained the property in question <br />either by mowing or landscaping, so we cannot help but wonder what <br />an apartment complex owned'by him will look like in years to come. <br />6. The property owners, feel they purchased their land fully aware <br />of the zoning surrounding them,, dust as *..Childers did, and no one <br />expected -a zoning change or feel that one is appropriate. <br />We the property owners only ask that you investigate the area <br />and make a judgment that will be fair to the majority. <br />Sincerely, f <br />Rebel Road Property ojmerg <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. <br />JOHN GOODKNIGHT INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE OWNS LOTS I AND <br />2 OF WESTWOOD SUBDIVISION WHICH ARE IMMEDIATELY BACK OF SKATETOWN. <br />HE SPOKE IN BEHALF OF THE REZONING REQUEST, AND CONTINUED THAT IF <br />THE REZONING IS APPROVED, THEY PLAN TO DEVELOP THOSE TWO LOTS INTO <br />FOURPLEXES IN A STYLE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN DOCUMENTED BY GEORGE <br />CHILDERS. HE FELT THAT NO MATTER HOW YOU LOOK AT IT, THIS PROPERTY <br />IS A BUFFER BETWEEN A COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND -THE RESIDENTIAL <br />NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST, AND HE BELIEVED THEY COULD SERVE THE <br />BUFFER FUNCTION WELL AND ADEQUATELY AS A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT <br />AND THAT WHAT THEY PROPOSE WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING <br />NEIGHBORHOOD AND AN ASSET TO IT. <br />SCOTT CHISHOLM NEXT TOOK THE FLOOR REPRESENTING THE REBEL <br />ROAD PROPERTY OWNERS AND NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS BEEN PRESENTED <br />WITH A PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUESTED REZONING SIGNED BY <br />65 PEOPLE IN THE AREA REPRESENTING 210 ACRES OF LAND. HE POINTED <br />OUT THAT NO ONE PRESENT IS HERE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE COMMERCIAL <br />DEVELOPMENT GOING ON ON THE OPPOSITE CORNER. INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE <br />BOUGHT PROPERTY IN THIS AREA KNEW THAT THE COMMERCIAL WAS THERE. <br />57 <br />APR 9 1980 8oox 43 PAc O <br />