Laserfiche WebLink
SPR 9190 <br />aoox 43- PAGE 205 <br />Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO FIND A COMPROMISE, BUT SHE WAS NOT <br />COMFORTABLE WITH MAKING ANY CHANGES IN THE REQUEST THAT HAS BEEN <br />PRESENTED TO THE BOARD. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT SOME KIND OF PROGRESSION IS <br />AN ABSOLUTE NECESSITY. HE NOTED THAT SKATETOWN HAS BEEN MENTIONED <br />A GOOD DEAL AND HE WAS GRATEFUL THAT THE PEOPLE WHO RUN IT, OPERATE <br />IT SO WELL, BUT HE POINTED OUT THAT THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO SKATETOWN <br />CANNOT AND WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AS MIRAFLORES SUBDIVISION. HE <br />STATED THAT HE COULD ACCEPT COMMISSIONER WODTKE'S SUGGESTION TO SPLIT <br />THE PROPOSED BUFFER. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD VOTE AGAINST ANY <br />REZONING FOR SEVERAL REASONS. HE FELT SUCH A REZONING WOULD BE <br />CONTRARY TO THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE NEIGHBORS, WHO WERE AWARE THAT <br />IT WAS C-1 ALONG THE STREET, BUT DID NOT EXPECT TO HAVE ANY TRANSI- <br />TIONAL ZONING. HE ALSO FELT THERE WAS A VERY IMPORTANT POINT RAISED <br />ABOUT WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL. <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON FELT THAT IN MOST INSTANCES HE WOULD <br />SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR BUFFER <br />ZONING. HE, HOWEVER, HAD TOURED THE AREA AND OBSERVED THE HOMES <br />BUILT OUT THERE AND THE DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE. HE FELT <br />THE MONEY INVESTED THERE WAS DONE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE WAS <br />COMMERCIAL NEARBY, BUT THEY CERTAINLY DID NOT BUILD THESE HOMES <br />FEELING THAT MULTIPLE FAMILY MIGHT GO IN ON A SMALL TRACT OF LAND <br />BY THE COMMERCIAL. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS, TO DENY THE ZONING CHANGE REQUESTED BY MR. <br />CHILDERS FROM R-1 TO R -2B BASED ON THE FACT THAT PROPERTY OWNERS <br />IN THE AREA (65 PEOPLE REPRESENTING ABOUT 210 ACRES) PURCHASED THEIR <br />PROPERTY AND BUILT AWARE OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND DID NOT BUY <br />WITH THE THOUGHT THAT THERE WOULD BE MULTIPLE FAMILY BETWEEN THEM <br />AND THE COMMERCIAL. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THE MOTION IS MADE TO DENY <br />THE REQUEST, AND HE WILL HAVE TO VOTE FOR IT BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST <br />