4/9/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER NEXT DISCUSSED THE ROAD CONSTRUC- TION PROPOSED BY MRS. HELEN HANSON FOR 80TH COURT AND 81ST AVENUE IN THE ROSELAND AREA. HE NOTED THAT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT WHEN YOU ARE CONSTRUCTING ROADS, CERTAIN PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. MRS. HANSON HAS COMPLIED WITH THIS REQUIREMENT AND NOW NEEDS APPROVAL OF THE PLAN SO THAT SHE MAY MOVE AHEAD WITH CONSTRUC- TION. MR. REVER COMMENTED THAT THE SIZE.OF THE CULVERT NEEDED SHOULD BE INDICATED ON THE PLAN. HE NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED ROADS WILL MEET COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT THAT THEY WILL NOT BE PAVED: THERE ARE NO PAVED ROADS IN THIS AREA. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED THE ATTORNEY IF THE BOARD SHOULD APPROVE THESE PLANS, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE BOARD IS MAKING A DECISION THAT THE ROADS DON T HAVE TO BE PAVED,AND BY ALLOWING MRS, HANSON TO CONSTRUCT THEM IN AN UNIMPROVED CONDITION, HE BELIEVED THE COUNTY WOULD BE ACCEPTING THEM FOR. MAINTENANCE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE NOTED THAT THESE ARE ROADS THAT HAVE BEEN PLANNED, BUT HAVE NEVER BEEN CUT IN AND OPENED, AND IT IS THE PEOPLE S RESPONSIBILITY TO OPEN THEM_._.___ - CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT WE HAD TURNED SOMEONE DOWN ON THIS SAME BASIS, BUT ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT WE DID MAKE SOME PEOPLE PAVE ROADS BECAUSE THEY WERE IN A NEW SUBDIVISION WHERE THE ROADS WERE PAVED. THE ROAD LEADING UP TO THOSE PROPOSED BY MRS. HANSON IS A GRADED ROAD. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAD A GOOD DEAL OF DISCUSSION WITH MRS. HANSON AND HAD INFORMED HER THAT SHE HAD TO CONSTRUCT BOTH ROADS AND CONNECT THEM UP: SHE COULD NOT JUST BUILD A PORTION OF THE ROAD TO HER LOT AND STOP. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT HE HAS A RENDERING WITH THE CULVERT SIZE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PLANS SUBMITTED BY MRS. HELEN HANSON FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION FOR 80TH COURT AND 81ST AVENUE IN THE ROSELAND AREA. 91