Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />.APR 2 31900 <br />anox 43 PACE 358 <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD VOTE AGAINST <br />THE MOTION ON THE BASIS THAT WE DONT NEED ANY ADDITIONAL R-1 <br />PROPERTY: ALSO, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS WEST OF THE LINE DRAWN ON <br />THE LAND USE MAP FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE, AND HE FELT YOU CAN BE <br />FLEXIBLE TO THE POINT WHERE THE MASTER PLAN BECOMES MEANINGLESS. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WILL SUPPORT THE MOTION. <br />HE BELIEVED THE PRESENTATION MADE BY ATTORNEY COOKSEY IS THE BEST <br />THE BOARD HAS EVER HEARD IN REGARD TO POINTING OUT THE REASONS <br />FOR PUTTING PROPERTY IN A HOLDING ZONE, AND HE CONCURRED THAT THE <br />PRINCIPAL REASON THIS PROPERTY WAS PUT IN A HOLDING ZONE WAS SO <br />THAT WHEN IT WAS -NOT USABLE FOR AGRICULTURE, IT COULD BE CHANGED. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON <br />AND CARRIED WITH COMMISSIONER LYONS VOTING IN OPPOSITION. <br />104 <br />