My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/23/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
4/23/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:52 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:23:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/23/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE MUNICIPALITIES, AND HE HAD BELIEVED IF THE PLAN WAS UNSATISFAC- <br />TORY TO THE CITY, THEY WERE GOING TO COME BACK WITH AN ALTERNATIVE. <br />HE FELT IT WOULD BE DOING AN INJUSTICE TO THE COMMUNITY TO SAY THAT <br />ONE GROUP OR ANOTHER DROPPED THE BALL, BUT SO FAR WE HAVE NOT GOTTEN <br />BACK TOGETHER. THE CHAIRMAN CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD BE VERY WILLING <br />TO LISTEN TO ANY ALTERNATIVE THAT WAS PRESENTED WITH THE ENDORSEMENT <br />OF THE WHOLE CITY COUNCIL. <br />MAYOR SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT THE COUNTY'S CONSULTANTS, <br />SOUTHERN, KELTON & ASSOCIATES, DELIVERED THEIR REPORT IN MARCH OF <br />1979, AND THE CITY DID RESPOND: THE PLAN WAS NOT TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE, <br />AND THERE WERE CHANGES. HE STATED THAT THEY WERE GIVEN THE IMPRESSION <br />THAT THERE WAS A GREAT POSSIBILITY OF ADDRESSING THE NORTH COUNTY <br />FIRE DISTRICT QUICKLY, AND ONCE THAT PRIORITY WAS DEALT WITH, WE <br />WOULD GET BACK TO WORK ON THE SOUTH COUNTY DISTRICT. MAYOR SCURLOCK <br />INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND CITY COUNCILMAN GREGG HAVE MET WITH <br />THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO DEVELOP SOME INITIAL FIGURES IN RESPONSE <br />TO THE SOUTHERN KELTON STUDY, AND THEY FEEL THAT THE ORIGINAL COMMITTEE <br />SHOULD BE RECONVENED AND REVIEW THE FIGURES THEY HAVE COME UP WITH IN <br />TERMS OF MILLAGE TO GO INTO A SOUTH COUNTY DISTRICT,WITH OR WITHOUT <br />THE CITY. HE PERSONALLY FELT THAT A UNIFIED SOUTH COUNTY DISTRICT <br />WAS THE BEST ANSWER, EVEN IF THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES DID NOT <br />WISH TO'PARTICIPATE. MR. SCURLOCK REITERATED THAT THE WHOLE ISSUE <br />SHOULD BE RE-EXAMINED BY THE COMMITTEE, AND HE ALSO NOTED THAT A <br />GREATER PARTICIPATION BY BOTH THE VOLUNTEER AND PAID FIREMAN WAS AN <br />IMPORTANT FACTOR. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAD PROBLEMS WITH USING <br />THE COMMITTEE AND WOULD PREFER THAT THEY TAKE WHAT THEY LIKE OUT OF <br />THE SOUTHERN KELTON STUDY: ADD WHATEVER THEY WISH TO'TIT: PRESENT IT <br />TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND GET THEIR CONSENSUS. THEY CHAIRMAN FELT IN <br />THAT WAY, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO DEFINE THE AREAS WHERE WE HAVE ANY <br />DIFFICULTY AND THEN GET BACK TOGETHER. COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONCURRED. <br />MAYOR SCURLOCK STATED THAT IF THAT IS WHAT THE COMMISSION <br />DESIRES, IT CAN BE APPROACHED IN THAT MANNER. HE FELT QUITE FRANKLY <br />THERE IS"SOMEWHAT OF A LACK OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE ENTITIES. <br />107 <br />APR 2 31990 o -m 4T' -h4: . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.