Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER DISCUSSED THE SECOND DRAFT OF <br />THE PROPOSED MINING ORDINANCE WHICH WAS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD FOR <br />REVIEW, AND POINTED OUT THAT TO MAKE THIS AN OPERATIVE ORDINANCE, <br />IT WILL NECESSITATE HAVING A COUNTY ENGINEER. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF THE PRESENT DRAFT INCORPORATES <br />THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ON THE FIRST DRAFT, <br />AND MR. REVER STATED THAT IT DOES. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THE BOARD CAN REVIEW THE <br />DOCUMENT AND THE NORMAL PROCESS WOULD BE TO SUBMIT IT TO THE ZONING <br />COMMISSION AND THEN LET IT COME BACK TO THE BOARD. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FELT OUR PRESENT TECHNICAL <br />REVIEW COMMITTEE IS SUFFICIENT, AND MR. REVER EXPLAINED THAT THEY ARE <br />SUGGESTING THAT THEY BE USED WITH JUST A FEW EXTRA PEOPLE ADDED, IF <br />NEEDED; THEY DO NOT WANT ANOTHER COMMITTEE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY REFERRED THE SECOND DRAFT OF THE PROPOSED <br />MINING ORDINANCE TO THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW AND <br />RECOMMENDATION. <br />THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED AND <br />RECONVENED AS THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE LAURELWOOD SUBDIVISION <br />STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT. <br />APR 2 31980 <br />It <br />135 <br />BooK � 43 4li� <br />