Laserfiche WebLink
March 19, 1980 <br />MEMO <br />TO: Indian River Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: David Rever, Director of Planning and Zoning <br />SUBJECT: Request to extend the time of the Public Hearing for <br />rezoning of the property owned by Jonnie Dahlstrom <br />At the last meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board, the staff recom- <br />mended extension of the Public Hearing on the rezoning requested by <br />Jonnie Dahlstrom in order to provide sufficient review before giving <br />a recommendation. Mr. Dahlstrom's agent agreed to this extension, and <br />the Board voted unanimously to continue this hearing until their next <br />scheduled meeting on March 27, 1980. <br />It is respectfully requested that the Board of County Commissioners <br />move their scheduled date for the Public Hearing on this application <br />to their next regular meeting date of May 7, 1980. This will provide <br />the needed time period of 30 days after the rescheduled Planning and <br />Zoning meeting. It is our understanding that a move for continuance <br />at the time presently scheduled for this meeting, to a time specific, <br />will relieve the necessity to readvertise. <br />Thank you for your consideration in this matter. <br />PnE 326 <br />MR. REVER CONTINUED THAT HE HAS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO <br />PRESENT ON THIS PARTICULAR REZONING, BUT FEELS THERE NEEDS TO BE A <br />DECISION AS TO WHETHER THE BOARD WILL HEAR THE REQUEST AT THIS TIME <br />OR HAVE IT CONTINUED BECAUSE OF THE NOTIFICATION PROBLEM. HE THEN <br />EXPLAINED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS RELATED TO THE EXTENSION GRANTED BY <br />THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AND THE STATUTE WHICH REQUIRES THAT <br />THE CLERK NOTIFY THE PROPERTY OWNER 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE BOARD'S <br />PUBLIC HEARING. THIS TIME PERIOD WAS NOT COMPLIED WITH AND ONLY 26 <br />DAYS COULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN. THE APPLICANT, THROUGH HIS AGENT, <br />HOWEVER, HAS WAIVED THE RIGHT TO HAVE THE 30 DAY NOTICE AND IS ASKING <br />THAT WE PROCEED. MR. REVER INFORMED THAT IF IT IS LEGALLY ACCEPTABLE, <br />BOTH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE APPLICANT ARE READY TO GO AHEAD <br />WITH THE HEARING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THE BOARD THAT IT IS NOT IN THE <br />BEST INTERESTS OF EITHER THE APPLICANT OR THIS BOARD TO CONSIDER A <br />VA <br />