My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/06/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
07/06/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:34:46 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/06/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2928
Book and Page
127, 257-308
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
429
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Ginn recommended Commissioner Lowther, Vice Chairman Neuberger, <br />and Commissioner Macht serve on the VAB. <br />Commissioner Macht mentioned that both Commissioner Lowther and Vice <br />rd <br />Chairman Neuberger would be remaining on the Board but the 3 member could be problematic. <br />(Clerk’s Note: Chairman Ginn and Commissioner Adams were not seeking re-election; <br />Commissioner Macht was seeking re-election and had opponents.) <br />Rejection of the per diem was briefly discussed. <br /> <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted <br />Resolution No. 2004-072 appointing the 2004 Value <br />Adjustment Board members (Commissioner Lowther, <br />Commissioner Macht, & Vice Chairman Neuberger) and <br />rejecting statutory per diem compensation. <br /> <br />12.B. COUNTY ATTORNEY – FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF <br />COUNTIES VS. STATE OF FLORIDA – JUVENILE JUSTICE <br />COST SHIFT <br /> <br />County Attorney Collins reviewed his memorandum of June 29, 2004 concerning <br />the Department of Juvenile Justice cost-shift on detention. The State has made it the counties’ <br />responsibility for housing of juveniles pending adjudication. It is structured so we will pay for <br />Indian River County juvenile residents for any reason until their case is disposed of. The FACo <br />says this is an unfunded mandate contrary to the State’s Constitution as the cost shift was not <br />rds <br />approved by 2/3 of the Legislature. FACo thinks it is important to draw the line on unfunded <br />mandates. He did not see a need for us to be a named party in this suit because many of the larger <br />counties are involved probably because of a larger fiscal impact on them. A voluntary special <br />July 6, 2004 <br />29 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.