Laserfiche WebLink
1O.B.3. REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM SPENCER SIMMONS REGARDING UTILITY <br />USAGE FEE <br />Spencer Simmons, Simmons Construction and Development, 118 43rd Avenue, <br />representing himself and Meadows County Square, discussed a project where his company had <br />installed a 4" main and tap under the road to tie into the force main for their small lift station. He <br />said Mr. Meeks, the owner to the north, was planning to tap into his lines and he felt that he <br />should pay his half of the expense. He questioned why the County Attorney's Office would not <br />allow this item to be presented to the Board nor allow this to move forward. <br />Utilities Director Erik Olson conveyed that it was not unusual for a Developer to lay <br />utility lines, and when someone taps in, they pay a portion of the cost. He believed the issue was <br />that this was "after the fact," and that the focus of the project had been on the impact fee issue. <br />He stated that if the line which was put under the road was of minimal size, that a Developer's <br />Agreement might be required, and that Mr. Meeks would not be happy with joining in on the <br />Agreement. Director Olson said he would have staff review this again to see if this is practical, <br />and if there is a middle ground on the process. <br />Commissioner Wheeler wanted to know if the County had leverage to ensure Mr. Meeks <br />would pay his portion. <br />Director Olson said that Mr. Meeks had not yet tied into the line but was preparing to do <br />so. He clarified that the County does have the ability to mandate the project at this time, but is <br />limited to five years, beyond the five years it sunsets; meaning that if Mr. Meeks were to come <br />back in six years, it would be sun-setted and he would not be obligated to tie in and pay his <br />proportionate share. He also expressed that staff's goal is to minimize the bores under the road <br />for the existing service line. <br />17 <br />July 7, 2009 <br />