My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/10/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
08/10/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:37:32 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/10/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2929
Book and Page
127, 406-465
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
432
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the agenda, he opined that the government access TV channel is a perfect place for the candidates <br />to conduct a debate. <br />Vice Chairman Neuberger agreed that everyone has the right to instruct their <br />government, but added that the Public Discussion part of the Board’s agenda is not dictated by law <br />and pointed out that there are many other ways for citizens to instruct their representatives and it <br />need not be during Commission meetings. <br />When Mr. Heady wished to rebut, Vice Chairman Neuberger stated that Mr. Heady <br />had already used his 3-minutes, ruled out him of order, and asked that he be escorted from the <br />podium. <br /> <br />9.B.2. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – TIM ZORC – ROADWAY <br />LEVEL OF SERVICE “F,” BUILDING DEPARTMENT NEW <br />STAFF, AND TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES <br />th <br />Tim Zorc, <br />4415 5 Place SW, a local home builder and member of the Treasure <br />Coast Builders Association, wanted to clear up some information concerning the additional staff <br />for the Building Department. He specified that the Building Department is run as an enterprise <br />fund and the developers pay large amounts of that budget. He expressed thanks for the on-going <br />relationship with staff to ensure that money collected remains in the department. He liked getting <br />the monthly reports on the departments financial status. <br />Mr. Zorc <br />Second, asked if there will be continued discussions on LOS “F.” If yes, <br />then he would request that the Board temporarily postpone the implementation of the September <br />st <br />1 impact fee, because many of the fees were determined based on roadway projects. But if the <br />LOS is changed, the cost of those projects would be subtracted out and could potentially change <br />the amount of the traffic impact fees. He suggested that they first finish the LOS discussion and <br />see if any changes are warranted in the fee schedule. <br />rd <br />Mr. Zorc <br />’s third point was that he favored a boulevard concept road design for 43 <br />Avenue (rather than a center continuous turn lane) no matter how wide it is decided to make it. <br />August 10, 2004 <br />24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.