Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lowther, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Macht, to hire an <br />independent consultant to do an evaluation on the items <br />listed on the additional backup submitted for this item. <br /> <br />Commissioner Adams understood (and it was confirmed) that all of what is on the <br />list would be included in an RFQ. <br />County Administrator Baird suggested they might use a continuing services contract <br />to make it quicker. <br />Vice Chairman Neuberger specified that he wanted to be certain that the motion was <br />clear to staff. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and it carried <br />unanimously (4-0 Commissioner Ginn absent). (The Board <br />approved hiring an independent consultant to evaluate all <br />items listed on the backup submission as follows: <br />independent consultant evaluation; 5-lane versus 3-lane; <br />roadway and intersection capacity; committed <br />development, level of service “D”, “E”, and “F”, <br />concurrency exemption; Richard Oujevolk’s methodology; <br />th <br />traffic diversion to 58 Avenue – thru trucks, -connection <br />to Kobelgard Road, -trip assignment model; alternative <br />thth <br />routes between 66 Avenue and 20 Avenue; traffic <br />calming/buffers; public information meeting(s); <br />presentation(s) to BCC; complete study in 120 days; and <br /> <br />study cost $50,000.) <br /> <br />August 10, 2004 <br />39 <br /> <br />