5/21/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MAY 2 11980 � Book ' 43 o GE 510 DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE REPAIRS NEEDED FOR THE TRUCK)AND THE BOARD EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE CARE OF THE EQUIPMENT. COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED INSTIGATING AN ACCOUNTING SYSTEM FOR THE EQUIPMENT IN THE BARN; IF SOMETHING MAJOR GOES WRONG WITH A TRUCK, FOR INSTANCE, PERHAPS A REPORT COULD BE MADE CONCERNING THE REPAIRS. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA TO MONITOR THE MAINTENANCE AND THE UPKEEP OF THE COUNTY VEHICLES. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ADVISED THAT HE WOULD ASK FOR A DAMAGE REPORT AND A MAINTENANCE MONITORING REPORT IN THE FUTURE FOR COUNTY VEHICLES. COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT COMMISSIONER DEESON GET IN CONTACT WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN FELLSMERE AND FIND OUT WHO WILL BE DOING THE REPAIRS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS AS REQUESTED BY THE FELLSMERE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT. .ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, AND REFERRED TO PARAGRAPHS % AND 8 OF THAT AGREEMENT. HE FELT IN ORDER TO CLEAR UP THE ISSUE, A PHRASE SHOULD BE INSERTED INTO PARAGRAPH % SUCH AS "THE CONCURRENCE DOES NOT JEOPARDIZE THE OBLIGATIONS OF THE MUNICIPALITIES AND TOWN TO THE COUNTY." CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED WITH THE ATTORNEY THAT THE ADDED WORDING WOULD BE BETTER IN THAT PARAGRAPH. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT ORIGINALLY PARAGRAPHS 7 AND 8 HAD BEEN ONE PARAGRAPH, AND WAS CURIOUS AS TO WHY THEY HAD BEEN BROKEN UP. HE CONTINUED THAT THE WORDING THAT APPLIED TO BOTH PARTIES WAS THAT THE COUNTY HAD NO PROBLEM BUT RESERVED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THEIR AGREEMENT WITH THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES. THE ATTORNEY ALSO NOTED THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT A PARTY TO THE AGREEMENT, JUST CONCURRING TO IT. ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT,