My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/21/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
5/21/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:27:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/21/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. REVER FELT THAT COULD BE A POSSIBILITY AND THERE COULD <br />ALSO BE SOME MULTIFAMILY. HOWEVER, THE MAJORITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT <br />SHOULD REFLECT THE FLAVOR OF THE SURROUNDING ZONING. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CONFIRMED THAT IF YOU HAD R—IA AND ALLOWED <br />P.U.D., YOU MIGHT GET SOME MULTI -FAMILY, BUT THE MAJORITY STILL WOULD <br />ADHERE TO THE SINGLE FAMIL ;AND AROUND THE PERIPHERY, YOU WOULD <br />CERTAINLY CONFORM TO EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THIS IS ALL -RIGHT IN A 100 OR <br />1,000 ACRE TRACT, BUT WHAT ABOUT A 10 ACRE PIECE? HE NOTED THAT IN <br />SOME PLACES, THEY HAVE MADE P.U.D. SO RESTRICTIVE THAT THEY NEVER USE <br />IT, AND HE FELT A LOT DEPENDED ON HOW YOU CLASSIFY A It COMMON WALL. 11 <br />MR. REVER COMMENTED THAT A FREE STANDING WALL WOULD BE <br />SINGLE FAMILY, AND POINTED OUT THAT THESE ARE ALL DETAILS THAT HAVE <br />TO BE THOROUGHLY DISCUSSED. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED THAT WHAT THE PLANNING DIRECTOR IS <br />LOOKING FOR NOW IS MERELY CONCURRENCE WITH THE DIRECTION THEY ARE <br />HEADING. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER CONTINUED TO DISCUSS P.U.D. AND ITS <br />ADVANTAGES AS LISTED IN HIS MEMO. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THAT ONE MORE.ADVANTAGE, PARTICULARLY <br />WITH THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS ON WATER AND SEWER, IS THAT WE WILL <br />HAVE A TAG ON WHAT THE DENSITY REQUIREMENTS WILL BE AND SO BE ABLE <br />TO KNOW THE POTENTIAL FOR THE AREA. HE COMMENTED THAT WE CAN USE <br />P.U.D. IN SUCH A FASHION THAT IT BECOMES A MANAGEMENT TOOL RATHER <br />THAN A DEVELOPMENT TOOL AND WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THIS CAN BE <br />ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME WE HAVE SET FOR OURSELVES, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE LIKED THE APPROACH PRO- <br />POSED AND THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH CONCURRING WITH THE MEMO AS <br />SUBMITTED AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF PERSON, HE THOUGHT WE HAD ALREADY <br />AUTHORIZED LOOKING FOR CONSULTANTS. <br />MR. REVER AGREED THAT THE BOARD HAD AUTHORIZED HIM TO GO <br />AHEAD AND CHECK OUT CONSULTANTS, AND STATED HE WILL HAVE PROPOSALS <br />FROM FOUR FIRMS BY FRIDAY AND WILL RECOMMEND HIRING ONE OF THEM AT <br />THE MEETING OF .JUNE 4TH. HE EMPHASIZED THAT HE ALSO DOES WANT ANOTHER <br />MAY 2 1 <br />—87— <br />' , . 't Boa. - : pi' 589 <br />980 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.