My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/21/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
5/21/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:27:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/21/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED MR. BEGAN°S REQUEST TO SECURE THE <br />SERVICES OF A CETA CLERKITYPIST TO ASSIST WITH THE SECTION S EXISTING <br />HOUSING RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. THIS MATTER WAS CONTINUED FROM <br />THE PREVIOUS MEETING, AND THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR REPORTED THAT <br />MR. REGAN HAS SUBMITTED A JOB DESCRIPTION AND BELIEVES HE CAN KEEP <br />SUCH AN EMPLOYEE BUSY. THEY CAN MAKE DO WITH THE PRESENT EQUIPMENT. <br />MR. NELSON STATED THAT HE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE JUST USE THE PRESENT <br />PERSONNEL UNTIL WE DETERMINE THE DIRECTION OF THIS PROGRAM. <br />MR. REGAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS TWO PEOPLE WORKING <br />ON THE RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - A PROGRAM MANAGER AND AN ACCOUNTING <br />CLERK. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE WORK TO KEEP A CETA CLERK/TYPIST <br />ACTIVELY ENGAGED, AND THEY WOULD EMPLOY SOMEONE WHO ALREADY HAS TRAINING <br />BUT NEEDS EXPERIENCE IN REAL WORK SITUATIONS. THIS PERSON WOULD BE <br />AVAILABLE ON A SIX MONTH BASIS. HE NOTED THAT IT DOES NOT COST THE <br />COUNTY ANY ACTUAL DOLLARS; IT WOULD GIVE THEM BETTER PRODUCTION; AND <br />IT WOULD BRING THIS PERSON UP TO SPEED TO BE EMPLOYABLE. <br />THE BOARD CONTINUED TO DISCUSS THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ALREADY <br />EMPLOYED AND WORKING ON THIS PROGRAM AND THE FACT THAT ONLY 39 LEASES <br />HAVE BEEN SIGNED. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT WE SEEM -TO SPEND A <br />LOT OF MONEY ADMINISTERING THE PROGRAM FOR A VERY SMALL RETURN. <br />MR, REGAN NOTED THAT THE COUNTY HAS A CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP <br />WITH HUD IN REGARD TO THIS PROGRAM AND THE MONIES INVOLVED, AND SOME- <br />TIME DOWN THE PIKE THE BOARD WILL HAVE TO DECIDE WHETHER THEY WANT TO <br />RETAIN THIS PROGRAM OR POSSIBLY TURN IT OVER TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT HUD, BASED ON THEIR EXPERIENCE OVER THE YEARS, <br />ARRIVED AT A COST TO GET A PROGRAM CRANKED UP, AND THEY NEGOTIATED <br />A $40,000 START-UP COST WITH US,- PLUS $10,000 OF EQUIPMENT, FOR THE <br />PURPOSE OF ENTERING INTO APPROXIMATELY 120 LEASES. HE INFORMED THE <br />BOARD THAT INITIALLY THE PROGRAM WE REQUESTED WAS FOR 100 UNITS AND <br />WE SPELLED OUT THAT IT WOULD TAKE TWO YEARS TO LEASE THIS MANY, BUT <br />THEY GAVE US 120 UNITS AND ONLY ONE YEAR TO LEASE THEM. WE DID NOT <br />BELIEVE THIS WAS POSSIBLE, BUT THEY WANTED US TO TRY IT. MR. REGAN <br />-97-43" <br />MAY 2 -11980 BOOK FACE 59O. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.