My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/23/2005 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
08/23/2005 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2018 3:00:52 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 5:59:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/23/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3032
Book and Page
129, 370-415
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
249
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />P.A. REPESENTING CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE <br />FUTURE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, INC. <br />Commissioner Davis pointed out that some developers have been denied <br />concurrency and he wanted to formulate a method of payment of impact fees and to address the <br />issue of concurrency by creating a system that counts concurrency and at the same time does not <br />allow the large developers to prevent a small developer from obtaining a building permit. This <br />dilemma is beginning to affect the roads. He used Vero Lake Estates and Pointe West as <br />examples. <br />Chuck Mechling, <br /> 1990 Pointe West Drive, wanted to see a system devised where <br />there can be better planning in the long run and with an accelerated road program. <br />Discussion ensued regarding trips associated with a project being counted when a <br />developer pays impact fees. Staff felt considering all the trips up to the time of buildout would take <br />up to two years to determine those numbers. <br />Commissioner Davis expressed the importance of counting all the trips in the <br />pipeline as early in the process as possible, as a reservation, so they can plan to work with the <br />Department of Transportation on roads. <br />Administrator Baird wanted to methodically look at the system and see if there are <br />any ramifications. He felt impact fees should be paid at building permit time and that it should <br />remain that way. <br />Joseph Paladin <br />, Atlantic Coast Development, inquired what the Board wanted the <br />Growth Awareness Committee to work on. <br />Administrator Baird responded that the Board wanted more safeguards. He asked <br />the committee to address when impact fees should be paid in full, the need for a better road system, <br />and to work with staff and have them bring a recommendation back to the Board. <br /> <br />There was CONSENSUS to leave payment of impact <br />fees at the time of obtaining the building permit. For <br />22 <br />AUGUST 23, 2005 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.