6/4/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES AND IT WAS NOTED THAT IT COULD BE MORE THAN ONE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD RECEIVE THE BENEFIT OF THIS RELEASE. COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THE BOARD HAS MADE A DETERMINATION THAT THE CURVE IS NOT GOING TO BE UTILIZED IN THE ROAD; IT IS NOT NEEDED, AND THE ONLY ACTION THE BOARD CAN TAKE IS TO DECIDE TO RELEASE THE DEDICATION. HE ADDED THAT THE QUESTION IS GOING TO BE WHO IS WILLING TO PAY THE FEE FOR THIS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED, AND OBVIOUSLY IT WILL BE THE PROPERTY OWNER OF LOT 9. COMMISSIONER WODTKE REITERATED THAT A ROAD IS NOT GOING TO BE PUT IN AS THE COUNTY DOES NOT HAVE A USE FOR IT. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER LYONS THOUGHT THAT EITHER IT IS GOING TO BE WORTH $4,000 OR IT WILL BE WORTH NOTHING. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER WODTKE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION N0. 80-53 FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDON- MENT AT 2ND STREET & 14TH AVENUE. ATTORNEY COLLINS MENTIONED THAT SUBSEQUENT TO ADVERTISING THE RESOLUTION, IT SHOULD NOT BE FORMALLY EXECUTED UNTIL_COMPENSATION IS RECEIVED. HE SUGGESTED AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN, SUBSEQUENT TO RECEIPT OF $4,000. COMMISSIONER LYONS WONDERED WHETHER THE BOARD SHOULD EXCLUDE THAT PORTION OF THE DEDICATION THAT EXISTS ON LOTS I AND 8, AS THIS PROPERTY NOW WILL GO UP INTO THOSE LOTS. ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT MR. GALEIWOULD BE ENTITLED TO A TITLE TO THAT PART OF THE DEDICATION THAT ABUTS HIS PROPERTY, AND THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BENEFIT BY THE ACTION. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THERE CAN BE NO GUARANTEE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THAT IT WAS TRUE. MR. MATUCHA NOTED THAT MR. GALE OWNS LOTS S AND 9, MR. CUDNEY.OWNS LOT 1, AND THE $4,000 WOULD INVOLVE PROPERTY THAT ABUTS ON ALL THREE LOTS. 29 oQ F '6,4 JUN 4190 � r