6/4/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�J THE LIBRARY AND FURTHER RECOMMENDS THAT A SECOND COMMITTEE BE ESTABLISHED WHEREIN PERSONS FROM THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTA- TIVES FROM THE COUNTY COMMISSION,AND REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE ORIGINAL COMMITTEE PARTICIPATE, AT WHICH TIME ALL DETAILS CAN BE REFINED PRIOR TO ASSUMPTION BY THE COUNTY. COMMISSIONER LYONS THANKED THE COMMITTEE FOR THEIR FINE WORK. HE NOTED THAT THE FINAL REPORT WAS ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR THE SECOND MEETING IN JUNE, AND IT SEEMS WE ARE ONE MEETING BEHIND OUR ORIGINAL GOAL. HE WONDERED IF THE COMMISSION WOULD CONSIDER GIVING MR. MASON THEIR COMMENTS, WRITTEN OR VERBAL, IN ORDER THAT THE COMMITTEE MIGHT SPEND THE NEXT TWO TO FOUR WEEKS IN GETTING THE BOARDS QUESTIONS ANSWERED AND INCORPORATED IN THE FINAL REPORT. IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THIS WAS A GOOD SUGGESTION. COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THAT THE STUDY COMMITTEE SHOULD CONTINUE, BUT NOTED THAT THE STUDY COMMITTEE COULD NOT DETERMINE THE BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BOARD, AND THIS WILL HAVE TO BE LOOKED AT CLOSELY AT BUDGET TIME TO SEE IF WE CAN COME UP WITH THIS MUCH MONEY UNDER THE 5% CAP. HE CONTINUED THAT HE WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE TO HEAR COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT FROM THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION AND THE LIBRARY BOARD. COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT WE NEED FURTHER -DISSEMINATION OF THE REPORT AND ALL THE INPUT WE CAN GET. HE NOTED THAT WHILE WE STILL HAVE THEM WORKING, IT MAKES IT THAT MUCH EASIER TO PUT IT TOGETHER, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE COMMITTEE GO ON FOR ANOTHER MONTH. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE IS VERY IMPRESSED WITH THE DETAIL OF THE REPORT, AND HE AGREED THAT THE SECOND WEEK IN .JUNE IS UNREALISTIC FOR A FINAL REPORT. MR. NASON NOTED THAT HE WILL BE OUT OF TOWN FOR SOME TIME AND SUGGESTED THAT THE FIRST WEEK IN AUGUST WOULD BE A MORE REALISTIC DATE, CHAIRMAN SIEBERT AGREED AND NOTED THAT IT WOULD BE HARD FOR THE BOARD TO MAKE ANY DECISION 'IN ANY.EVENT UNTIL WE KNOW MORE ABOUT THE BUDGET PACKAGE. 43 4a 'poq 545