6/4/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 41988 BOOK 43 PAGE 688 NOT UNCUSTOMARY TO COLLECT THE MONIES THAT WAY, BUT IT IS UNUSUAL THAT YOU ARE MAKING THE IMPROVEMENTS NOW AND SPENDING THOSE DOLLARS NOW AND RECOVERING THEM OVER A PERIOD OF TWO TO TWO AND A HALF YEARS. ATTORNEY O'HAIRE FELT IT WOULD BE A LESSER PERIOD OF TIME THAN THAT SINCE TWO BUILDINGS ARE UP AND THE PROJECT IS MOVING RIGHT ALONG. HE URGED THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT HIS LETTER OF PROPOSAL TODAY SO HE COULD GET BACK TO HIS CLIENTS WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY. t CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE REALLY DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH IT AND BELIEVED WE ARE GETTING ALL WE NEEDED TO HAVE. ENGINEER .JOHN ROBBINS POINTED OUT THAT THE STATEMENT ON THE BOTTOM OF TABLE 1 SETS OUT THAT THE PRO RATA SHARE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY COST ASSOCIATED WITH THE REQUIRED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS HAD TO BE MADE IN' ANY EVENT, --AND THIS PROJECT DOES NOT DIRECTLY IMPACT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS. ENGINEERS ROBBINS AGREED THAT THERE WAS VERY LITTLE IMPACT. HE REITERATED THAT THE RECOMMENDATION THEY DID MAKE WOULD BE TO PUT IN A WET WELL LARGE ENOUGH ULTIMATELY TO GO TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH ALTER- NATE #6. ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER WHAT EXPENSE THE COUNTY WOULD INCUR TO HOOK UP EACH UNIT, AND MR. LINER STATED THAT WE WOULD NOT INCUR ANY. THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE PUTTING IN THE GRAVITY SYSTEM AND THE LINES. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A CONTRACT ON OUR STANDARD UTILITY CONTRACT FORM,CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSAL OUTLINED BY ATTORNEY O'HAIRE IN HIS LETTER OF MAY 13, 1980. ENGINEER ROBBINS NOTED THAT THE BID RECEIVED INITIALLY ON THE PUMPING STATION WAS EXCESSIVE, AND THEY HAVE SENT COPIES OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATION TO A CONTRACTOR WITH WHOM THEY HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE FOR REVIEW. HE BELIEVED IT IS THE BOARD'S INTENT TO PUT THIS PROJECT 86