My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/18/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
6/18/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:07:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/18/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THAT HE NOW SEES EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES - THEY HAVE NOT BEEN <br />ABLE TO ADD ANOTHER PERSON TO THEIR STAFF AS ANTICIPATED BECAUSE <br />THEY HAVE NOT FOUND QUALIFIED PEOPLE; SO,THEIR STAFF HAS NOT BEEN <br />RELIEVED ANY. SECONDLY, THE PROBLEM OF SPACE. HE HAS FOUND THAT <br />THE ATMOSPHERE IN WHICH THE STAFF WORKS RIGHT NOW IS NOT CONDUCIVE <br />TO COMPLETING THE PLAN - THERE ARE PEOPLE CONSTANTLY COMING THROUGH - <br />MEETINGS BEING HELD - IT IS DISRUPTIVE. THEREFORE, HE WOULD LIKE TO <br />REVISE THE SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CONSULTANTS TO ENCOMPASS <br />MORE DIRECT ASSISTANCE, THOUGH HE FEELS IT IS THE STAFF WHO SHOULD <br />MAKE THE PRIMARY DEVELOPMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF HE WAS SAYING THAT WE DONT HAVE <br />THE STAFF OR THE SPACE TO DO THIS JOB. <br />MR. REVER STATED THAT THEY DO HAVE THE STAFF, BUT BECAUSE <br />THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO HIRE ANOTHER PERSON AND BECAUSE OF THE <br />WORK ATMOSPHERE, IF THEY COULD GET A LITTLE MORE HELP ON DIRECT <br />SERVICES, IT WOULD HELP. HE FULLY BELIEVED THAT THEY CAN DEVELOP THE <br />PLAN, BUT IT IS JUST THAT IT HAS BEEN DECIDED WE WANT TO DO THE <br />WHOLE PACKAGE AT ONE TIME. HE FELT POSSIBLY THEY COULD REARRANGE <br />THEIR OFFICE SPACE TO FACILITATE A BETTER WORKING ATMOSPHERE. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WAS NOT ANXIOUS TO HIRE <br />THIS TYPE OF CONSULTANT TO DO THE NITTY GRITTY WORK, AND CHAIRMAN <br />SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE REASON HE QUESTIONED THE SCOPE OF SERVICE WAS <br />BECAUSE IT SEEMS AS IF IT IS MOSTLY TECHNICIAN S WORK. <br />MR. REVER STATED THAT HE MAINLY WANTED THE CONSULTANTS TO <br />WORK ON THE ORDINANCES TO FIT THE PLAN AND TO ANALYZE THE PLAN AS IT <br />TAKES SHAPE. HE FELT MOST OF THE WORK IS IN THE ORDINANCES. THE <br />TECHNICIAN S WORK WOULD BE GATHERING DATA, AND HE BELIEVED THEY ARE <br />AT THE HEART OF THAT NOW. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REMARKED THAT THE CHAIRMAN OR VICE CHAIRMAN <br />HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT, BUT THE QUESTION INVOLVES <br />THE SCOPE OF WORK AND WHETHER IT IS SATISFACTORY TO THE COMMISSION. <br />HE STATED THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THE AGREEMENT WITH <br />THE CONSULTANTS AND FEELS THAT IT IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT. <br />105 <br />JUN 181980 Fag 43 PAGE 841 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.