6/18/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNER REVER DISAGREED WITH THE PERSON WHO SAID IT COULD BE DONE FOR $7,500, BUT THAT WAS NOT THE ISSUE. HE ADDED THAT THE STATE WAS SATISFIED ALL THE MONEYS COMING FROM THEM HAD BEEN PAID. MAYOR FLOOD THOUGHT VERY LITTLE WORK HAD BEEN DONE ON THE PLAN SINCE PLANNER REVER BEGAN TO WORK FOR THE COUNTY, AND HE HAD SEEN MR. MARSH ONLY A FEW TIMES. MAYOR FLOOD THOUGHT THAT MR. MARSH, ON HIS OWN TIME, DID WORK WITH THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN, BUT STRONGLY DISAGREED WITH MR. REVERS STATEMENT THAT IT WAS GOING TO COST $25,000 MORE TO COMPLETE THE PLAN. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT THEY SHOULD ALL TRY TO FIND A WAY TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM AND WORK THINGS OUT THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THERE IS A PROBLEM IN USING UNINCOR- PORATED FUNDS TO DO THE PLAN FOR SEBASTIAN. DISCUSSION ENSUED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE PLAN FOR SEBASTIAN IS APPROXIMATELY 60% COMPLETED. COMMISSIONER LYONS THOUGHT THE COUNTY WAS MORALLY OBLIGATED TO COMPLETE THE PLAN, BUT WAS UNCERTAIN HOW TO DO IT LEGALLY. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT MR. MARSH WAS HIRED FOR THIS PURPOSE AND AT THE TIME, COMMISSIONER WODTKE WANTED IT SPECIFIED IN THE AGREEMENT THAT IT WOULD BE FOR A CERTAIN NUMBER OF HOURS, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, IT WAS NOT DONE THAT WAY. COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THE CONTRACT HAD EXPIRED IN OCTOBER OF 1979, AND THEREFORE, THE COUNTY HAD NO AGREEMENT WITH THE CITIES AT THIS TIME. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THE TIME FRAME HAS EXPIRED BUT THE CONTRACT HAS NEVER BEEN TERMINATED; HE THOUGHT THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN OR THE COUNTY NEEDS TO TAKE SOME AFFIRMATIVE ACTION BEFORE THE CONTRACTS COULD BE TERMINATED. COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT IF THE COUNTY IS GOING TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT, THERE SHOULD BE A TIME FRAME; THIS WOULD ALSO ENABLE THE COUNTY TO TAKE CARE OF THEIR REGULAR WORK LOAD. HE ADDED THAT THE CONTRACT SHOULD BE WRITTEN TO CONTAIN JUST THE ELEMENTS 41 Bflt►1( 43 PACE 77* I