6/18/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F_ JUN 18 19 90 BooK 43 ?AcE ,782 MR. MARSH COMMENTED THAT THEIR RECOMMENDATION IS BASED NOT ONLY ON LONG TERM NEEDS, BUT ALSO SHORT TERM AND MID TERM NEEDS AS WELL, AS STRESSED IN THE LAST PARAGRAPH OF MR. REVER'S MEMO. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF MR. REUTER HAD SAID HE WOULD DEDICATE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MR. MARSH FELT HE HAD JUST INDICATED HE WOULD BE FAVORABLY INCLINED TO NEGOTIATE. MR. MARSH CONTINUED THAT HE HAD INFORMED MR. REUTER THAT IT WOULD BE MARGINAL AS TO HOW MUCH WE COULD DO AS FAR AS ADDITIONAL DENSITY WAS CONCERNED, DENSITY. THE BOARD STATED POSITIVELY THAT WE CANNOT NEGOTIATE AS TO MR. MARSH DID NOT FEEL THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD PARTICIPATE IN THE COST OF THE ROAD. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE COSTS SET OUT IN THE DRAWING ARE JUST BASIC COSTS FOR SOIL CEMENT AND ASPHALT, AND THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY CULVERTS OR HEADWALLS THAT MIGHT BE NEEDED. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO CLEARING LAND AND OBTAINING RIGHTS-OF-WAY. COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT AS A NORMAL PROCEDURE, WE WOULD GET 50'. MR. MARSH STATED THAT IT IS THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OPINION THAT WE COULD EXACT 50' FROM THE DEVELOPER BASED ON THE FACT THAT IT IS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, BUT DID NOT BELIEVE WE COULD REQUIRE HIM TO PAVE THE FULL ROAD BECAUSE THERE ALREADY IS A SUBDIVISION ON THE EAST SIDE. COMMISSIONER LYONS POINTED OUT THAT IN THE DRI PROCESS IF IT IS FELT A ROAD NEEDS TO BE WIDENED, THAT IS WHAT IS REQUIRED. HE FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE AN IMPORTANT PART OF OUR FUTURE ROAD NETWORK AND 20TH AVENUE WILL BE A THROUGH ROAD WITH A LOT OF TRAFFIC. HE, THEREFORE, DID NOT FEEL WE SHOULD HAVE A JOG AND TURN WHEN WE COULD HAVE A REGULAR FOUR-WAY INTERSECTION WITH A MAIN STREET. DISCUSSION THEN ENSUED REGARDING THE FACT THAT THE BRIDGE SYSTEM ON 19TH AVENUE IS NOT ADEQUATE TO PROPERLY ACCOMMODATE SCHOOL BUS TRAFFIC, AND ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS CONFIRMED THAT THOSE CULVERTS WHEN INSTALLED WERE NOT REQUIRED TO BE OF A SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO COPE