6/18/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MR. ENG NOTED THAT PAGE 22-5 REFERS TO THE IMPLEMENTA- TION SCHEDULE AND STATES THAT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 201 PLAN IS DEPENDENT UPON DEVELOPMENT AND SUCCESSFUL NEGOTIATION BETWEEN THE INTERLOCAL AGENCIES AND IS CONTINGENT UPON THE FINANCIAL AND OTHER ARRANGEMENTS TO BE NEGOTIATED. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HIS COMMENTS REALLY APPLY TO MUCH MORE THAN THE IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE, AND HE WONDERED IF COMMISSIONER LYONS' MOTION COULD INCLUDE THAT SOMEWHERE A STATEMENT WOULD APPEAR THAT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 201 PLAN IS SUBJECT TO THE COUNTY RECEIVING SATISFACTORY GRANT AND LOAN FUNDS FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES TO ACCOMPLISH THE ITEMS SET OUT IN THE PLAN. COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE WOULD INCLUDE ATTORNEY COLLINS STATEMENT IN HIS MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER DEESON AGREED, AND THE MOTION WAS REWORDED AS FOLLOWS: MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER DEESON, TO APPROVE ADDENDUM N0. 1 TO THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY 201 FACILITIES PLAN SUBJECT TO A STATEMENT BEING INCORPORATED IN THE PLAN SETTING OUT THAT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 201 PLAN IS SUBJECT TO THE COUNTY RECEIVING SATISFACTORY GRANT AND LOAN FUNDS FROM FEDERAL AGENCIES TO ACCOMPLISH THE ITEMS SET OUT IN THE PLAN. COMMISSIONER WODTKE THEN DISCUSSED THE FIGURES ON TABLE 22-1, CALCULATION OF LOCAL SHARE OF COSTS AS REVISED .JUNE 5, 1980, AND ASKED IF THE FIGURES HAD CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY. MR. ENG REVIEWED THE FIGURES AND EXPLAINED THAT ESSENTIALLY THE TOTAL PROJECT DROPPED ABOUT $200,000; SO, THE LOCAL SHARE ONLY CHANGED A SMALL AMOUNT, COMMISSIONER WODTKE CONTINUED THAT THE NOTE ON THE BOTTOM STATED THAT THIS REPRESENTS COSTS TO INSTALL TRANSMISSION LINES THROUGH VERO BEACH AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO REPRESENT THE COST TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, BUT TO INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, HE WONDERED HOW THIS MIGHT RELATE TO INDIAN RIVER SHORES. MR. ENG STATED THAT THIS IS THE LINE THAT LOOPS AROUND WEST OF TOWN AND GOES THROUGH THE CITY LIMITS OF VERO BEACH. THIS 67 43 X803 JUN 18 1980