6/25/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MR. SCHMUCKER DID NOT FEEL IT WAS THAT LARGE A PROBLEM, AND FELT IT WAS MAINLY A SURVEY PROBLEM TO THE DEVELOPER CAUSED BY INSUFFICIENT SUPERVISION. VICE CHAIRMAN LOY REQUESTED THAT MR. SCHMUCKER MAKE THE OWNER AWARE OF THESE CONCERNS. SHE NOTED THAT THE FIRST EXTENSION IS AUTOMATIC - BUT NOT AFTER THAT. ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT WHEN THERE IS A KNOWN DEVIATION FROM A PLAT, THEY SHOULD UPDATE THEIR PLAT SO THAT THE EXTENSION IS BASED ON A PLAT THAT IS WORKABLE AND IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS ON THE GROUND NOW. SENIOR PLANNER MARSH DID NOT FEEL THE REALIGNMENT WAS SO EXTENSIVE THAT IT COULD NOT BE HANDLED THROUGH THE ACTUAL PROCESS OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF WE, IN EFFECT, REPLAT, WILL IT RUN ANOTHER 18 MONTHS AND THEN COULD BE EXTENDED? ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT WHAT HE IS SUGGESTING IS THAT PRIOR TO AUGUST 21ST, MR. SCHMUCKER SUBMIT TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT A REVISED PLAT. MR. SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE WILL HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE OWNER AND SEE WHETHER HE WANTS TO RESURVEY THE ENTIRE TRACT OR WHETHER HE WILL MOVE THE ROADWAY TO FIT, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED HE HAS THAT OPTION. VICE CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF THE BOARD WISHED TO MAKE THIS PROVISION A PART OF THE MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE WOULD WITHDRAW HIS MOTION AND COMMISSIONER DEESON WITHDREW HIS SECOND, ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SAN SEBASTIAN SPRINGS, PHASE 1, FOR AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS FROM AUGUST 21, 1980, SUBJECT TO THE OWNER PROVIDING THE COUNTY WITH A REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT CONSISTENT WITH THE ROAD AS IT EXISTS OR THE MOVING OF THE ROAD TO MAKE IT CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAT AS IT EXISTS, AND SUBJECT TO THE MEMO FROM SENIOR PLANNER MARSH DATED JUNE 19, 1980, WHICH IS A PART OF THE RECORD. JUN 2 5 19 80 25 o°ax 41fAcf 874