Laserfiche WebLink
JUN 2 5 1980 eaoK 43 PAA03 <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS DID NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THAT <br />AND DID NOT THINK IT WOULD SET A PRECEDENT SINCE IT IS CLOSER TO <br />TOWN THAN SOME OTHER PROPERTY WE MIGHT PURCHASE: THIS WOULD BE <br />$1,250 AN ACRE. HE ASKED FROM WHAT FUND THE PURCHASE PRICE WOULD <br />BE TAKEN, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED HOPEFULLY, THE 201 FUND. <br />ASSUMING WE HAVE TO PAY IT BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS STATED HE VIEWED THIS AS A DUAL TAXATION PROBLEM. <br />COORDINATOR THOMAS FELT THE LOGICAL PLACE WOULD BE FEDERAL <br />REVENUE SHARING. HE COULD NOT AGREE THAT THIS WILL NOT SET A PRECE- <br />DENT SINCE THE CARDINAL RULE IN APPRAISING IS RECENT SALES, BUT <br />FELT IT MIGHT BE GOOD IF IT DID SET A PRECEDENT, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE CHANCES ARE THE COUNTY'S <br />OFFER WILL BE TURNED DOWN, BUT HE FELT THEY WILL JUST HAVE TO MAKE <br />THEIR. BEST SHOT. <br />ATTORNEY QUINN COMMENTED THAT SINCE THE COUNTY IS GIVING <br />A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF CREDENCE TO THE TWO APPRAISALS GIVEN THEM, HE <br />WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THE APPRAISAL MADE BY JACK SHERMAN AT <br />THE SAME TIME WAS IN EXCESS OF $200,000. THESE APPRAISALS ALL WERE <br />USED IN THE LITIGATION. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED, AND IT WAS AGREED TO STAY WITH THE <br />$60,000 OFFER MADE IN COMMISSIONER LYONS' MOTION. <br />THE VICE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED <br />ON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />ATTORNEY CHESTER CLEM, PRESIDENT OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION, <br />CAME BEFORE THE BOARD ON BEHALF OF THE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES TO <br />DISCUSS THE PROBLEMS SET OUT IN THE FOLLOWING MEMORANDUM FROM <br />JUDGE SMITH: <br />54 <br />