Laserfiche WebLink
Father Crowley <br />askedwhy should they take the risk since there was no certitude on <br />the damage created by radiation. He again asked that the tower be moved to another mile and a <br />half away and not jeopardize the lives of young kids and elders. <br /> <br />Lannie Greene, <br />representative of Nextel, discussed coverage needs that would not <br />be met if they relocate the tower. He also addressed the matter of radiation and read portions of the <br />American Cancer Society Study regarding radio frequency waves, which it compares to the same <br />as in our microwave ovens. <br /> <br />Dr. Cynthia Consalo <br />, resident, and member of the Governor’s Council on <br />Excellence in Long-term Care, spoke on the factors of radiation, one of which is what the media <br />says. She recalled an article in the morning newspaper regarding microwave popcorn that induces <br />cancer. She expressed that it was the Governor’s and the Council’s concern that the “quality of life <br />and dignity of this fragile population” be maintained. <br /> <br />th <br />Ken Shearn, <br /> 7300 20 Street, #616 Village Green, was concerned with the radius <br />of radiation and its long-term effect. He suggested the use of eminent domain to move the tower. <br /> <br />Mr. Greene <br />commented on the study mentioned by Father Crowley and his <br />suggestion that the tower needed to be a mile or two away from populated areas. If that was the <br />case, he said, they would not have any wireless coverage anywhere except for rural areas. He <br />argued that the tower does pose a public good, in that, it is critical for some of their customers. <br />Further, Nextel would comply with FAA and FCC rules and Indian River County ordinance as <br />well. <br />Chairman Neuberger asked what would result if the Board denied the application <br />and asked Nextel to move a mile north. <br /> <br />September 12, 2006 <br />15 <br /> <br />