My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/9/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
7/9/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:10:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/09/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J U L 91980 ada 44 PA F. 16 <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />July 1, 1980 <br />Page -2- <br />In this regard we have discussed with Mr. Jennings the future need for an <br />east -west collector at the southern end of 6th Avenue which would probably <br />tie into the southern most portion of an extended Indian River Blvd. Exis- <br />ting development, current planning, and observed development pressures all <br />point toward more intensive land use activities in this area. <br />A viable means of providing for future needs would be to designate a proposed <br />6th Street extension as a major thoroughfare, thereby allowing for the dedi- <br />cation of the necessary rights-of-way as development occurs. The condemnation <br />of the triangular piece located at 6th Avenue and U.S. #1 would still be <br />necessary for a 90 degree 6th Street tie-in with U.S. #1. Alignment on 6th <br />Avenue and 6th Street and the relation to U.S. #1 will need to be studied care- <br />fully; however, the future need for such a collector is felt to warrant consider- <br />ation at this point. <br />A final point worth discussion also is the previous consideration of a trade <br />off on an established value of the square footage condemned for the 6th Avenue - <br />6th Street tie-in, as compared to the value of the abandoned portions of 6th <br />Avenue. This is felt to be consistent with an overall attempt to equitably <br />remedy the situation and provide for future needs as well. Thus the remaining <br />issue would rest upon a decision as to access limitations to the south which <br />may in fact need to be addressed by the legal staff. <br />We hope that this input will be of some assistance in this regard. If you <br />have any questions or need additional information, please advise. <br />DMR: jt <br />Enclosure <br />cc: Ken Schindler <br />I <br />I <br />)1 ;i <br />- 4 <br />.1 <br />I • <br />e� - _ :_ - 'rc'-e•. , <�.c•— _ . m•f'. y .. s.•♦• _ .K�. • 'ctcv apl.�rou � ' h I <br />I ! , <br />� <br />' '�,o. ..�, <br />•mac. _. <br />:e•. • <br />I <br />. <br />_ <br />� I <br />, <br />I <br />• <br />`. _ <br />- <br />M »\ ..»,. <br />` <br />�`• � --�t-- <br />I <br />t�;�• �'� T� _ is <br />.I <br />1 I <br />— -- <br />I ! , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.