My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/17/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
09/17/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2018 2:51:37 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Impact Fee Workshop
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/17/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4021
Subject
Impact Fee Update
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7318
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 TRAFFIC CONSULTANT PRESENTATION <br />Scott Leftwich, Leftwich Consulting Engineers, addressed the issues of how an <br />impact fee is taken into account. Through a PowerPoint Presentation he discussed the <br />"consumption -based Impact Fee Theory," looking at the fees charged to new development based <br />on the roadway capacity consumed for that new development. He stated that the existing <br />roadway deficiencies are not charged to new development, and the needed improvements are <br />based on the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) developed by the County. <br />Mr. Leftwich displayed computerized images to explain capacity consumed by <br />proposed land use; calculation of impact fees (costs to credits); and discussed the traffic impact <br />fee calculation, vehicle miles of travel (VMT), trip rate, percent of new trips, and the average trip <br />length. <br />Vice Chairman Davis questioned the percentage of new trips calculation and <br />explained why he felt commercial development saves trips. He thereafter engaged in discussion <br />with Mr. Leftwich on whether certain trips should be regarded as a pass -by or a trip. <br />Mr. Leftwich continued his presentation by discussing primary trip type <br />examples, and comparing primary versus diverted, pass -by (captured) and secondary trips. <br />Commissioner Flescher questioned the trip type examples given and wanted to <br />know how those primary examples could apply to justify an increase in impact fee and in <br />expense. <br />Mr. Leftwich continued his explanation of trip type examples, and how the <br />surveys were conducted, using origin and destination to determine if a trip exists and measuring <br />September 17, 2008 6 <br />Public Workshop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.