My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/13/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
8/13/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:53 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:15:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/13/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 131980 <br />TO BE DISPLAYED IN BROWN WRAPPERS. <br />BOOK 44 FAA 257 <br />HE INFORMED THOSE PRESENT THAT <br />THE COUNTY DID ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT NUDITY IN PLACES SERVING <br />ALCOHOL, AND IT WAS RATHER AN EXPLICIT ORDINANCE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE ORDINANCE AS ADOPTED <br />PROHIBITS NUDITY IN RELATIONSHIP TO ALCOHOL BECAUSE LAWS TO PROHIBIT <br />NUDITY PER SE HAVE NOT BEEN UPHELD BY THE COURTS, AND TYING THIS TO <br />THE BEVERAGE CONTROL LAWS CALLS FOR A HIGHER STANDARD OF ENFORCEMENT. <br />PASTOR MCCLAIN STATED THAT HE HAS LIVED IN LARGE CITIES <br />SUCH AS TAMPA WHERE THESE ESTABLISHMENTS ARE RATHER COMMON, AND HE <br />HAS BEEN EXPOSED TO SOME OF THE CRIME THAT IS RELATED. HE WAS THANK- <br />FUL THAT VERO BEACH DOES NOT HAVE THIS, AND IF ENACTING ANY ORDINANCE <br />IN ADDITION WOULD BE NECESSARY, HE WOULD CERTAINLY FEEL IT SHOULD BE <br />DONE. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS NO ACTUAL EN- <br />FORCEMENT POWERS AND CAN ONLY REQUEST THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES <br />TO COOPERATE IN ENFORCING THESE LAWS MORE STRICTLY. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy COMMENTED THAT THERE HAVE BEEN MANY REFER- <br />ENCES TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY ORDI- <br />NANCES PERTAIN ONLY TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS: EACH OF THE MUNICI- <br />PALITIES HAS THEIR OWN ORDINANCES. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT EVERYONE APPRECIATES THAT THIS IS A <br />VERY DIFFICULT LEGAL PROBLEM, AND NOTED WE MUST BE GUIDED BY WHAT WE <br />LEGALLY CAN DO. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT ALTHOUGH OUR STATE STATUTES <br />MAY NOT ALLOW THIS TYPE OF LAW, HE WOULD LIKE THE ATTORNEY TO BE <br />AUTHORIZED TO OBTAIN A COPY OF THE DALLAS "BROWN BAG" ORDINANCE TO <br />SEE WHETHER IT COULD BE APPLICABLE TO THIS COUNTY AND WOULD HOLD UP <br />IN OUR COURT SYSTEM. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WILL LOOK INTO THIS AND <br />COME BACK WITH A RECOMMENDATION. HE NOTED THAT WE HAVE STATUTES <br />THAT ARE EXTENSIVE, BUT DID NOT KNOW THAT THEY ARE BEING STRICTLY <br />ENFORCED. HE POINTED OUT THAT WHILE THE COMMISSION CAN LEND ITS <br />INFLUENCE TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY, INDIVIDUALS ALSO CAN <br />COMPLAIN TO THE AUTHORITIES ABOUT ANY VIOLATION THEY SEE. HE BELIEVED <br />IF THERE IS ENOUGH PRESSURE PUT ON THE RETAIL MERCHANTS, THEY WOULD <br />BE GLAD TO COMPLY WITH THE EXISTING LAWS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.