My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/6/2005
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
09/6/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 1:58:43 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/06/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3032
Book and Page
129, 433-491
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
271
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Michael O’Haire <br />, a lawyer with offices on Cardinal Drive, represents a developer <br />(Doug Engle) who is not a contractor and cannot get a bond. He explained what insurance the <br />conditions surety companies are looking for when giving bonds. He gave the history of the Lakes <br />at Sandridge project expressing how the rules have changed since the development began. He <br />would like the Board to tell staff they did not intend to adopt an ordinance that would have a <br />retroactive effect. <br /> <br />Ron Lees <br /> explained that he and his family have been unable to move into their <br />home in the Lakes at Sandridge because of the bond situation. <br /> <br />Administrator Baird stated the Lakes at Sandridge are waiting to get their bond and <br />staff does not have the ability under the rules to resolve Mr. Lees dilemma. <br /> <br />Mr. O’Haire <br /> stated the problem is that the County has adopted a new set of rules <br />which have had unintended effects when they are applied retroactively. He asserted that the way <br />to get Mr. Lees in his home would be to tell staff this ordinance does not apply to projects that <br />started before its adoption. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis would like to see how fast the Board can get these people in <br />their homes if the County allows the contractor to be bonded. <br /> <br />Attorney Collins also suggested a change in the language by adding “and/or <br />contractor” to the ordinance. <br /> <br />Danny Delisle <br />, Vero Beach, stated he is still waiting on a CC because he was told <br />it is difficult for the County to enforce the bond. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis stated that no longer could a developer do what Mr. Delisle is <br />referring to. <br />September 6, 2005 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.