My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/27/1980 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
8/27/1980 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:18:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/27/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG <br />2 71990 <br />Boa <br />.44 PAcE373 <br />COMMISSIONER <br />LOY FELT THE OVERRIDING THING WAS <br />THE SAFE- <br />GUARD OF GREEN SPACES; IT IS NOT TO BE PINPOINTED AS TO WHETHER,THE. <br />RECREATIONAL FACILITY IS GOING PRIVATE OR PUBLIC. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT ASSUMING IT WAS DETERMINED <br />THIS WAS A PUBLIC FACILITY AND, UNDER THE TERMS OF THE STATUTE, THE <br />BOARD ACCEPTED THE COVENANT AND IT TURNED OUT LATER THAT IT WAS NO <br />LONGER A PUBLIC FACILITY, WHAT WOULD THE COUNTY'S POSITION BE? <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ADVISED THAT THE BOARD COULD TAKE SOME <br />ACTION AND THE COVENANT WOULD BE IN DEFAULT, AND ATTORNEY GOULD AFFIRMED <br />THERE WOULD BE NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE BOARD WOULD BE <br />OPENING THE FLOOD GATES ON THIS MATTER, AND FELT THE ONLY WAY HE KNEW <br />TO KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING WAS TO REFER IT TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. <br />HE FELT THIS WAS A UNIQUE CASE THAT DOES NOT EXIST WITH OTHER CLUBS. <br />ATTORNEY GOULD DID NOT WANT TO SUGGEST HOW THE BOARD COULD <br />DECIDE ON THE OTHER CLUBS, BUT TO NOTE THAT THIS GOLF COURSE HAS BEEN <br />IN EXISTENCE FOR 60 YEARS. HE ADDED THAT ALL THEY ARE DOING IS LOOKING <br />TOWARD THE FUTURE. <br />LOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE THAT THE COUNTY <br />DOES NOT ACCEPT OR AGREE TO THE COVENANT WITH THE RIOMAR COUNTRY CLUB. <br />THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER LOY,THAT THE COUNTY ACCEPT THE COVENANT OF THE RIOMAR COUNTRY <br />CLUB AS REQUESTED IN THEIR LETTER OF JULY 24, 1980. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY COMMENTED THAT IF THE MOTION PASSES, SHE <br />WOULD LIKE FOR THE BOARD TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONFER WITH ATTORNEY <br />GOULD AND ATTORNEY COLLINS TO ADD JUST A FEW OTHER PRIVISOS TO THE <br />COVENANT THAT MIGHT BE UNIQUE TO THE COUNTY. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS REQUESTED THAT THE ABOVE BE ADDED TO <br />THE MOTION. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE INQUIRED IF THE BOARD WOULD AGREE TO <br />THE COVENANT WITHOUT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH BEING INVOLVED. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY DID NOT THINK IT WOULD MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE; <br />HOWEVER, IT WOULD SECURE THE RIOMAR COUNTRY CLUB FOR THE FUTURE, AND <br />ALSO SECURE THE AREA SO THAT IT WILL REMAIN THE TYPE OF FACILITY IT <br />IS PRESENTLY. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.