8/27/1980 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER REPORTED THAT HE DID GET A DRAFT COPY OF THE REPORT AND DID RESPOND TO CITY MANAGER LITTLE. THERE WERE MORE QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE REPORT THAN THERE WERE ANSWERS; SO, HE NOTED THAT WE STILL HAVE TO MEET WITH THEM TO RESOLVE THESE QUESTIONS. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT WITH THE BOARD'S PERMISSION, HE AND MR. LINER WILL PROCEED TO TRY TO RESOLVE THIS AND HOPE TO HAVE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE NEXT MEETING. REPORT ON SEWER AGREEMENT - CITY OF VERO BEACH, INDIAN RIVER SHORES AND COUNTY - AND RELATED AGREEMENTS RF.WATER COMMISSIONER LYONS REPORTED THAT AFTER MORE MEETINGS, IT LOOKED AS IF THE COUNTY AND INDIAN RIVER SHORES HAD A POSITION FOR AGREEMENT, BUT NOW SOME QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN RAISED BY CITY COUNCILMAN GREGG IN REGARD TO THE HOSPITAL ALLOCATION. COMMISSIONERS LYONS DID NOT FEEL THAT THE HOSPITAL ALLOCATION HAS ANY BEARING ON THE AGREE- MENT WITH INDIAN RIVER SHORES, BUT MR. GREGG HAS TAKEN THE POSITION THAT THE DISPOSITION OF THE HOSPITAL ALLOCATION HAS TO BE SETTLED BEFORE HE WOULD RECOMMEND SUBMISSION OF THIS AGREEMENT. HE EXPLAINED THAT MR. GREGG'S POSITION IS THAT THE ALLOCATION WAS DONE FOREVER AND THAT THE COUNTY HAS NO MORE VOICE IN IT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, COMMIS- SIONER LYONS STATED THAT HIS POSITION IS THAT APPARENTLY NOBODY EVER CONTEMPLATED THE SITUATION IN WHICH THE ALLOCATION MIGHT BE IN EXCESS OF THE NEEDS OF THE PARCEL AND HE, THEREFORE, WAS NOT SURE THAT THE AGREEMENT REALLY REFLECTS THE INTENT OF THE PARTIES. HE BELIEVED WE HAVE TO SETTLE THIS PROBLEM IN THE LONG RUN, BUT DID NOT FEEL IT HAS TO BE SETTLED AS A CONDITION TO THE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT WITH INDIAN RIVER SHORES. COMMISSIONER WODTKE LEFT THE MEETING TEMPORARILY AT 2:20 O'CLOCK P.M. ATTORNEY COLLINS ALSO FELT THESE ISSUES SHOULD BE KEPT SEPARATE. HE CONFIRMED THAT THE AGREEMENT ABOUT THE HOSPITAL'S ALLOCATION DOES NOT ADDRESS THE POSSIBILITY OF ANY EXCESS ALLOCATION. 39 AUG 2 7 1990 BOOK 4 PA486