My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/10/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
9/10/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:21:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br />m <br />AUTHORITY TO FILE CROSS APPEAL AND HIRE APPELLATE ATTORNEY RE <br />ANNEXATIONS BY INDIAN RIVER SHORES <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE NOW HAVE THE <br />BRIEF IN FROM THE APPELLATE COURT ON THE INDIAN RIVER SHORES ANNEXA- <br />TIONS, AND BASICALLY IT IS PRETTY MUCH THE SAME ARGUMENTS THAT WERE <br />MADE AT THE ORIGINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING. HE CONTINUED THAT <br />LATELY WE HAVE TAKEN THE POSITION THAT THE ANNEXATIONS, IF THEY ARE <br />VOID, ARE VOID AS TO ALL THE PROPERTIES, NOT JUST THOSE OWNED BY <br />THE COUNTY, AND FOR THAT REASON, HE FELT IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE <br />TO FILE A CROSS APPEAL REQUESTING THE DISTRICT COURT TO OVERRULE THE <br />JUDGES SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER WHERE HE LIMITED IT JUST TO THE <br />COUNTY PROPERTY. ATTORNEY COLLINS THEN REPORTED THAT INDIAN RIVER <br />SHORES HAS HIRED A COUNSEL OUT OF PALM BEACH, WHO BASICALLY DOES <br />NOTHING BUT APPELLATE WORK, AND THE BRIEF HAS REQUESTED ORAL ARGU- <br />MENTS. ATTORNEY COLLINS, THEREFORE, SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY HIRE <br />A PALM BEACH APPELLATE FIRM TO ARGUE THAT CASE ORALLY ON BEHALF OF <br />THE COUNTY AND TO REVIEW THE BRIEFS. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE <br />HAS CONTACTED SOME FIRMS AND HAS A RECOMMENDATION - THIS COUNSEL S <br />FEES WOULD BE $75.00 AN HOUR WHILE THE COUNTY ATTORNEYS ARE BASICALLY <br />$60.00 AN HOUR, HE NOTED THAT HIS FIRM STILL WOULD DO MOST OF THE <br />WORK; THE APPELLATE COUNSEL WOULD REVIEW THEIR WORK, MAKE THE ADDI- <br />TIONAL COMMENTS, AND BE INVOLVED IN THE ARGUMENTS. ATTORNEY COLLINS <br />STATED THAT HE IS LOOKING FOR TWO THINGS: APPROVAL TO FILE THE CROSS <br />APPEAL AND AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, <br />APPEAL. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED WHAT THE REASON WAS FOR THE CROSS <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE COUNTY IS ABOUT TO <br />ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL LANDS THAT ALSO WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THE SAME <br />THING, AND IF WE CAN HAVE THIS COURT ENTER AN ORDER THAT THAT IS OUR <br />PROPERTY, WE CAN SAVE OURSELVES FUTURE LITIGATION. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO FILE THE <br />CROSS APPEAL AS DISCUSSED AND TO HIRE ADDITIONAL COUNSEL TO ASSIST <br />WITH THE APPELLATE WORK AS ABOVE. <br />114 <br />SEP 101980 <br />Boa: 44 F►�G% 550- <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.