My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/24/1980 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
9/24/1980 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:25:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Board of Fire Commissioners
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/24/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER LYONS NOTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN DISCUSSION <br />AT THE REGIONAL COUNCIL AS TO HOW THE NEW FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING <br />COUNCIL ACT READS AND HOW THEY SHOULD OPERATE, HIS SUGGESTION WAS <br />THAT SINCE WE ONLY HAVE ONE MUNICIPAL REPRESENTATIVE FROM THIS COUNTY <br />TO REPRESENT ALL THE MUNICIPALITIES, WE SHOULD FORMALIZE A ROTATIONAL <br />SYSTEM. IF ONE CITY TURNS IT DOWN, THEN THE NEXT CAN TAKE IT, ETC., <br />AND WHEN WE ARE TOLD WHO THE REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE ARE TO BE, <br />WE CAN SO INFORM THE COUNCIL. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE TALKED TO THE <br />ATTORNEY FOR THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL, AND IT SEEMS WE ARE <br />UNIQUE BECAUSE WE HAVE ONLY ONE APPOINTMENT AND BECAUSE WE DO NOT <br />HAVE A MUNICIPAL LEAGUE. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE TOLD THE <br />ATTORNEY WHAT WE HAVE IN MIND AS TO A ROTATIONAL SYSTEM AND WHILE <br />HE WASNIT REALLY ENTHUSED, HE DID NOT SAY WE COULDN`T DO IT. THE <br />ATTORNEY, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED THAT WE PROCEED AS SUGGESTED BY <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS,AND IF THIS PLAN IS CRITICIZED, WE CAN CHANGE IT. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT WE SHOW ALL THE MUNICI- <br />PALITIES, INCLUDING ORCHID, AS BEING ELIGIBLE AND SET THEM UP IN <br />ALPHABETICAL ORDER. HE CONTINUED THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME, SEBASTIAN <br />HAS THE REPRESENTATIVE AND VERO BEACH HAS THE ALTERNATE, AND HE <br />FELT WE OUGHT TO INFORM THEM AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE OF OUR PROPOSED <br />RULES, FORMALIZE THE RULES, AND LET THEM TELL US WHETHER THEY ARE <br />GOING TO PASS OR NOT. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO THE ROTATION WE HAVE BEEN ON, <br />AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THAT NOW IT WOULD BE VERO BEACH, INDIAN <br />RIVER SHORES, FELLSMERE, ORCHID AND SEBASTIAN. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT BASICALLY WE WILL BE LOOKING <br />FOR VERO BEACH AND INDIAN RIVER SHORES TO DESIGNATE THE PRINCIPAL <br />AND ALTERNATE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS EMPHASIZED THAT WE DO NOT WANT THE <br />ALTERNATE AND PRINCIPAL FROM THE SAME -CITY AT THE SAME TIME AND HE <br />THOUGHT THIS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE RULES. HE ALSO FELT WE SHOULD <br />INCLUDE SOME REQUIREMENTS FOR ATTENDANCE. <br />115 <br />SEP 2 41980 <br />800x 4 4Fr�rC aJ+l� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.