My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/24/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
9/24/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/24/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
® � r <br />THE MOBILE HOMES ON THE LOTS AND PROCEED TO PUT IN THE ELECTRICITY, <br />DRIVEWAYS, ETC., WHICH THEY COULD NOT DO OTHERWISE. THIS IS OF GREAT <br />ASSISTANCE TO THE DEVELOPER AND THE HOMEOWNER, <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THIS DOES NOT MAKE THE COUNTY <br />STAFF ALMOST AT THE BECK AND CALL OF VILLAGE GREEN TO CHECK EVERY <br />TIME THEY THINK THEY HAVE REACHED THE 95%. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED IF WE HAD MULTIPLE WITHDRAWALS, <br />THAT WOULD BE THE SITUATION, BUT FORMER ADMINISTRATOR JACK JENNINGS <br />WANTED IT MADE A ONE TIME WITHDRAWAL AT THE TIME IT WAS 95% COMPLETE. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED EVEN IF IT IS 95% COMPLETE, WE <br />STILL MUST BE COVERED FOR THE REMAINDER. HE NOTED THAT IT IS NOT <br />VILLAGE GREEN THAT PRESENTS THE PROBLEM, BUT THE FACT THAT THERE WILL <br />BE SUCH REQUESTS FROM MANY DEVELOPERS. HE FELT THE COUNTY IS ASSUMING <br />A SECONDARY LIABILITY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS AGREED THAT IS TRUE, BUT HE FELT THE <br />ENGINEER IS ASSUMING PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY. HE BELIEVED THAT IN <br />GENERAL THE COUNTY SHOULD DISCOURAGE THIS SORT OF THING BECAUSE IT <br />DOES CREATE SOME ADMINISTRATIVE HASSLE THAT THE COUNTY IS NOT COMPENSATED <br />FOR. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ALSO FELT THIS SHOULD BE HANDLED ON A <br />CASE BY CASE BASIS AS HE WAS OF THE OPINION THERE ARE SOME DEVELOPERS <br />WE WOULD NOT WANT TO BOND. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT FELT THERE SHOULD BE A TIME LIMIT FOR THE <br />WORK BEING COMPLETED BECAUSE OF THE RATE OF INFLATION, AND MR. SILLS <br />STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO A TIME LIMIT. HE FELT THEY <br />SHOULD BE FINISHED IN 30 DAYS, BUT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 120 DAYS, <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT WE HAVE SET UP A CERTAIN WORKING <br />RELATIONSHIP WITH THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPER. HE AGREED POSSIBLY WE <br />SHOULD CHANGE OUR WAY OF DOING BUSINESS, BUT FELT IT WOULD BE <br />CONSISTENT TO CONTINUE AS WE HAVE DONE WITH THIS DEVELOPER AND CHANGE <br />IT FOR OTHERS AS TIME GOES ON. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT WISHED TO MAKE SURE THESE REQUESTS ARE <br />SCREENED CAREFULLY, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAS <br />DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY. <br />53 BOO <br />K� �� ���� � <br />SEP 2 41980 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.