My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/13/2010 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2010
>
04/13/2010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2018 11:25:29 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:25:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/13/2010
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4038
Book and Page
139, 132-164
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8551
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the severance payout terms would be capped at four (4) <br />months of salary for the Deputy County Attorney, and <br />three (3) months of salary for the Assistant County <br />Attorney, as outlined in the proposed contract form. <br />Discussion ensued regarding creating policy for future hires. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan felt the proposed contract form provided the tools which the <br />County Attorney would need to hire quality people, while providing him with some flexibility to <br />dismiss an employee. He asked fellow Commissioners if the proposed template was what they <br />wished to use for future hires. <br />MOTION WAS AMENDED by Vice Chairman Solari, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner O'Bryan, to accept for <br />future hires, the draft contract form of the <br />Deputy/Assistant County Attorney Employment <br />Agreement. <br />Commissioners Wheeler and Davis supported the proposed contract form for the current <br />Deputy and Assistant County Attorneys, but did not want to follow it as a template for future <br />hires. <br />A wide-ranging discussion ensued among Commissioners and staff, which focused upon <br />how to handle future employee contracts. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and by a 2-3 <br />vote (Commissioners Flescher, Davis, and Wheeler <br />opposed), the Motion FAILED. The Board DENIED <br />accepting for future hires, the draft contract form of the <br />18 <br />April 13, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.