Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 81980 <br />BOOK 44„ , PAGE 820 <br />AMENDMENT REGARDING HOUSING AUTHORITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE BOARD HAD ENTERED INTO <br />AN AGREEMENT WITH THE HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND AT THE TIME, HE DID NOT <br />THINK THE PROVISION REGARDING ZONING ACTIONS WAS LEGAL AND IT WAS DELETED <br />FROM THE AGREEMENT. HE ADDED THAT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <br />REGAN AND HE WERE TOLD THAT IF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS TO RECEIVE <br />ANY FUNDS FROM HUD, THAT PROVISION MUST BE IN THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. <br />THE ATTORNEY COMMENTED THAT HE STILL HAS NOT CHANGED HIS OPINION BUT <br />WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD AMEND THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT TO <br />INCLUDE THE ZONING PROVISION. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES�AND IT WAS DETERMINED <br />THAT THE SPECIAL ACTS WOULD PROTECT THE COUNTY AS FAR AS ZONING IS <br />CONCERNED. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER Loy, THAT THE BOARD ADOPT THE AMENDED COOPERATION AGREEMENT <br />WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE SPECIAL ACTS. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED WHETHER OR NOT HUD WOULD FIND IT SATIS- <br />FACTORY IF WE ADOPT THE AMENDMENT WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A SIMPLE MOTION. <br />HE REITERATED THAT HUD IS LOOKING FOR THE AGREEMENT TO GO WORD FOR <br />WORD. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE WITHDREW HIS MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER <br />Loy WITHDREW HER SECOND. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE AMENDMENT TO COOPERATION <br />AGREEMENT AS DRAWN. <br />