My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/8/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
10/8/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:30:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/08/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 81980 <br />saU 44 PAuc-874 <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED CHANGE ORDER #Z FOR THE COURTHOUSE, <br />AND CHANGE ORDER #S AND #9 FOR THE ADMINISTRATION COMPLEX. <br />DISCUSSION WITH PAUL REINHOLD <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON COMMENTED THAT PAUL REINHOLD, PRESIDENT <br />OF REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION, INC. WANTED TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD. <br />MR. REINHOLD EXPRESSED HIS APPRECIATION FOR THE APPROVAL <br />OF THE VITAL CHANGE ORDERS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED. HE THEN SPOKE <br />ABOUT READING OF CERTAIN ACCOUNTS IN THE MEDIA ABOUT PROBLEMS ON THE <br />JOBS, AND WANTED TO DISCUSS THESE PROBLEMS WITH THE BOARD. MR. <br />REINHOLD CONTINUED THAT THEY ARE INVOLVED IN TWO SEPARATE CONTRACTS <br />WITH THE COUNTY - BOTH ARE COMPLEX REMODELING PROJECTS - AND AS THEY <br />HAVE GOTTEN INTO THE WORK, THEY HAVE DISCOVERED AREAS THAT WERE - <br />NOT APPARENT AT BIDDING TIME. REGARDING THE HARDWARE SCHEDULE, HE <br />STATED HE IS NOT CONCERNED WITH BLAMING ANYBODY, BUT MORE CONCERNED <br />ABOUT GETTING ON WITH THE PROJECT. HE ADVISED THEY DID EMPHASIZE THE <br />IMPORTANCE OF THE HARDWARE, AND FELT THEY HAVE BEEN DELAYED IN <br />PURSUIT OF THE HARDWARE SCHEDULE. MR. REINHOLD WANTED THE BOARD TO <br />RECOGNIZE THAT THEY HAVE QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED, AND <br />SOLUTIONS ARRITVED AT, AS DOCUMENTS THEN MUST BE DISTRIBUTED TO THEIR <br />SUB -CONTRACTORS. HE THEN SPOKE ABOUT THE 3 CHANGE PROPOSALS IN THE <br />JUDGES' AREA, AND THEY EXPECT TO BE GETTING ANOTHER CHANGE PROPOSAL. <br />MR. REINHOLD COMMENTED THERE ARE CHANGES IN FINISHES AND MILLWORK <br />AND, AT THE MOMENT, THEY CANNOT INDICATE WHEN WORK WILL BE COMPLETED <br />AS THEY DON T KNOW IF MORE CHANGE PROPOSALS WILL BE FORTHCOMING. HE <br />NOTED THAT WORK ON THE EXTERIOR HAS MOVED ALONG BECAUSE THERE HAVE <br />BEEN NO CHANGES - THIS IS RIGHT ON SCHEDULE - BUT THE INTERIOR OF <br />THE BUILDING STILL HAS A LOT OF QUESTIONS UNANSWERED. MR.lREINHOLD <br />ADVISED THAT DEMOLITION IS ALMOST COMPLETE IN THE COURTHOUSE; ONE <br />CEILING WAS REMOVED AND THEY FOUND ANOTHER CEILING, WHICH CONTA_I.NED <br />ASBESTOS. THEY HAVE CORRESPONDED WITH THE ARCHITECT ABOUT WHAT TO <br />DO ABOUT THE SITUATION BUT AS YET HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY ANSWER. HE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.