Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Polackwich suggested that perhaps the policy could be structured in a manner <br />other than requiring the deed restriction, which tends to be quite permanent and difficult to <br />remove. <br />Director Keating affirmed that staff could revise the policy to say a "legal document" and <br />put in more specificity when the Land Development Regulations are rewritten. <br />Attorney DeBraal felt that adopting an Ordinance regulating the host plants might work <br />better than the deed restriction, because the Ordinance can be repealed if no longer needed. <br />Attorney Polackwich agreed with Director Keating, and said that changing "deed <br />restriction" to "legal document" would enable the amendments to go forward. <br />Attorney Barkett supported Attorney DeBraal's suggestion to restrict the host plants by <br />Ordinance. <br />The Board CONSENSUS was to amend the wording in <br />Policy 6.5 as follows: "A deed restriction legal document <br />acceptable to the County Attorney's office, shall be...on <br />the subject site. That deed restriction legal document shall <br />prohibit the occurrence of host plants for either the <br />Caribbean Fruit Fly or ...The deed restriction legal <br />document may be structured..." <br />(Clerk's Note: This change will be incorporated into the Motion to transmit the EAR <br />based amendments to DCA). <br />Director Keating addressed Chairman O'Bryan's questions and comments regarding the <br />Affidavit of Exemptions in Policy 6.5. <br />21 <br />May 11, 2010 <br />