My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/18/2010 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2010
>
05/18/2010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2017 4:21:43 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:25:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/2010
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4040
Book and Page
139, 358-393
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8798
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MATTERS - NONE <br />12. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS <br />12.A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br />12.A. 1. REQUEST BY STAFF FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO <br />EXTEND THE "OTHER CORRIDORS" LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION <br />COMPLIANCE DEADLINE FOR MODIFYING NON -CONFORMING FREE- <br />STANDING SIGNS (LDR SECTION 911.22(9)(1)1. V) AND INVOKE THE <br />PENDING ORDINANCE DOCTRINE <br />Community Planning Director Stan Boling recapped his Memorandum dated May 5, <br />2010, by using a PowerPoint Presentation (on file). He spoke about the corridors that were <br />adopted since 1995, corridor regulations, sign regulations and compliance, the deadline to <br />modify or enhance non -conforming free-standing signs, and property owners' compliance <br />choices. He requested the Board consider directing staff to initiate a formal Land Development <br />Regulation (LDR) Amendment for a two-year deadline extension, and invoke the pending <br />ordinance doctrine based on the Ordinance in the backup. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the two-year deadline, considering this an unfunded <br />mandate forced upon businesses to comply to new signage requirements, consideration of a <br />grandfather clause, and not placing the cost burden on struggling businesses. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved <br />the Pending Ordinance Doctrine as amended, eliminating <br />Section 911.22(9)(i)1.v. <br />13 <br />May 18, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.