My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/18/2010 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2010
>
05/18/2010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2017 4:21:43 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:25:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/2010
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4040
Book and Page
139, 358-393
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8798
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br />Motion carried unanimously. The Board authorized Task <br />Order No. 1 with Carollo Engineers, for a Water Quality <br />Review and Evaluation, in the amount of $39,545.00, as <br />recommended in the memorandum of April 30, 2010. <br />TASK ORDER ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />13. COUNTY ATTORNEY MATTERS <br />13.A. VISTA GARDENS GOLF COURSE — CODE ENFORCEMENT ALTERNATIVES <br />County Attorney Alan Polackwich, Sr. recapped his Memorandum dated May 12, 2010, <br />providing background from the April 20, 2010 Board of County Commission Meeting where the <br />Board authorized staff to abate a recurring nuisance on the Vista Gardens golf course property by <br />mowing the grass and weeds, and recording a lien for costs. He gave his analysis and advised <br />the Board on the code enforcement alternatives. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Flescher, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wheeler, to approve <br />Alternative 2 - the less aggressive but also less expensive <br />approach of awaiting the outcome of the mediation in the <br />Vista Golf lawsuit against the Vista Associations to see if <br />a settlement results which eliminates the problem. <br />The Commissioners debated whether to add a 60 -day time limit to the mediation process <br />to allow for possible settlement, or to request an informational update in 60 days. <br />16 <br />May 18, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.