My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/18/2010 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2010
>
05/18/2010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2017 4:21:43 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:25:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/2010
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4040
Book and Page
139, 358-393
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8798
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attorney Polackwich announced that his intent was to streamline the process, not attend <br />the Water Control District Meetings or retain this function. He suggested designating the County <br />Administrator or his designee to either attend the Annual Meetings in person, or appoint a <br />representative to vote on matters by Proxy. <br />Commissioner Davis believed it would be best for the delegations to go through the <br />Commission Office, and Commissioner Wheeler felt it best to go through either the County <br />Administrator or County Attorney. <br />ON MOTION by Vice Chairman Solari, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved <br />Resolution 2010-041, as amended, delegating the <br />authority to the County Attorney County Administrator or <br />his designee to either attend in person or appoint a <br />representative by Proxy to vote on any matter at Annual <br />Meetings of any Water Control Districts within Indian <br />River County where Indian River County and/or the Solid <br />Waste Disposal District is a land owner within that <br />District. <br />13. D. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT POLICY <br />Attorney Polackwich recapped his Memorandum dated May 12, 2010, providing <br />background and analysis on the policy for contract employees. Presently there are five County <br />contract employees: County Administrator, Assistant County Administrator, County Attorney, <br />Deputy County Attorney, and Assistant County Attorney, and by Ordinance, the only one not <br />required to have a contract is the Assistant County Administrator. He said that according to <br />Code, the Board directly controls the contract terms of the County Administrator and the County <br />Attorney; therefore, he did not think a policy was necessary. <br />19 <br />May 18, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.