Laserfiche WebLink
TAKEN THE POSITION TO APPLY FOR A BINDING LETTER ON THE TWO SEA OAKS <br />PROJECTS, NOW KNOWN AS BEACH COLONY AND RIVER BEND. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS REITERATED THAT HIS MOTION SIMPLY STATES <br />THAT THE BOARD WOULD ASK FOR ASSISTANCE FROM THE REGIONAL PLANNING <br />COUNCIL, FORMALLY OR INFORMALLY, IN CONNECTION WITH THIS QUESTION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THERE ARE TWO PIECES OF PROPERTY <br />SEPARATED BY 1200' IN THE SEA OAKS AREA, AND THE DEVELOPER NEEDS TO <br />LET THE BOARD KNOW IF HE IS GOING TO DEVELOP ONE OR TWO PIECES. <br />HE ADDED THAT WE NEED TO KNOW THIS INFORMATION BEFORE WE GO TO THE <br />REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON COMMENTED THE DEVELOPERS HAVE NOT MADE <br />ANY DECISIONS AS TO WHETHER TO WITHDRAW ONE OF THE SITE PLANS. HE <br />FELT THE BINDING LETTER PROCESS IS NOT AN EASY TASK FOR ANY DEVELOPER. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS DID NOT THINK THAT BURDEN SHOULD BE ON THE <br />COMMISSION; THE DEVELOPER SHOULD LET THE BOARD KNOW WHAT IT PLANS <br />TO DO. <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON WONDERED IF THE BOARD WAS GOING TO REQUIRE <br />A BINDING LETTER ON JUST ONE PROJECT; HE DID NOT THINK ON ONE PROJECT, <br />THE BOARD'S POSITION WAS GOOD. <br />PROJECT. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT,IN HIS MIND, SEA OAKS IS ONE <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT COMMENTED THAT THERE IS A TOOL TO BE USED - <br />FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND HE FELT STRONGLY THAT THE USE <br />OF THIS TOOL SHOULD NOT HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE <br />PLAN. HE CONTINUED THAT IT IS A VIABLE TOOL THAT WILL HOLD DEVELOPERS <br />TO WHAT THEY SAY THEY ARE GOING TO DO. THE CHAIRMAN FELT THE <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT COULD COME UP WITH A PROPOSED ORDINANCE, USING <br />THIS TOOL RIGHT AWAY WITH OUR EXISTING ZONING. HE THEN ASKED FOR <br />THE BOARD'S THOUGHTS ON THIS MATTER. <br />23 Bb& 44 --:A . <br />0 CT 15 i9 �o <br />