Laserfiche WebLink
Further discussion and debate ensued pertaining to the proposed fire station priority list; <br />the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan and how it focuses on needs versus wants; the suggestion <br />that ESDAC consider instituting a 30 -year Capital Plan; the possibility of implementing a <br />strategic plan based on cause, volume, and future growth; directing staff to review the County's <br />future needs for planning purposes and bringing a list to the Board for review; and VLE's request <br />of wanting to be one of the top three locations on the priority list for a future Fire/EMS station. <br />Commissioner Davis stated that he wanted a list showing where the County's future <br />needs will be, relating to emergency services. <br />Chairman O'Bryan wanted to know if it was possible to shorten the call response time, or <br />if any operational changes could be made to stage a fire -rescue service closer to VLE. <br />Director King acknowledged that Chairman O'Bryan's suggestion had been discussed, <br />and elaborated on how and why the stations were placed in their current locations. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br />Motion carried. The Board by a 3-2 vote (Commissioners <br />Davis and Flescher opposed), denied the request by the <br />Emergency Services District Advisory Committee to <br />establish a fire -rescue station construction list with the <br />Vero Lake Estates area included as one of the three <br />proj ects. <br />ALL BACKUP DOCUMENTATION, RESOLUTIONS, AND ORDINANCES ARE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE <br />OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AND ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THESE MINUTES <br />June 8, 2010 <br />ESD <br />3 <br />