My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/10/2012 (4)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
07/10/2012 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2024 9:36:28 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:29:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Date
07/10/2012
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
11278
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Provides developers of low density projects the option to propose an alternative <br /> sidewalk/pedestrian system in lieu of providing a sidewalk on one side of all streets internal to the <br /> project. <br /> • Corrects a scrivener's error. <br /> • Clarifies criteria and process for extending site plan approvals. <br /> Note: As directed by the BCC at the June 19, 2012 hearing, no LDR amendment is included for <br /> density transition area FLUE Policy 1.48. During the July 2012 comprehensive plan <br /> amendment submittal window, staff will file an amendment to eliminate FLUE Policy 1.48 <br /> from the comprehensive plan. <br /> Chapter 952 & 910 <br /> • Updates numerous sections of Chapter 952 in accordance with BCC-adopted traffic and <br /> concurrency policies based on the recommendations from the 2006/2007 McMahon&Associates <br /> report. <br /> • Deletes trip generation and percent new trip data from the traffic ordinance and establishes the <br /> latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual as the source of <br /> such data. <br /> • Replaces previous interconnection requirements with new interconnection regulations and <br /> traffic calming criteria in accordance with FLUE Policies 1.54, 4.5, and 4.6, which state: <br /> [1.54] "In reviewing new development proposals, the county shall require <br /> vehicular and pedestrian connections as specified in Policy 4.5." <br /> [4.5] "Where proposed development projects abut undeveloped or developed <br /> property, the county shall require that such development be designed and <br /> constructed or guaranteed to accommodate both vehicular and bicycle/ <br /> pedestrian interconnections.Interconnections may include shared roadways or <br /> driveways that provide local traffic circulation. Exemptions shall be granted <br /> where interconnections would create a `funneling effect"through an existing <br /> neighborhood or have no potential for providing interconnectivity or through- <br /> street benefits(e.g.segments that dead-end into water bodies, built facilities, or <br /> environmentally sensitive areas). " <br /> [4.6] "By 2011, the county shall adopt traffic-calming standards and designs to <br /> address concerns about the speed of "cut-through" traffic. Traffic calming <br /> improvements shall be constructed with project interconnections where <br /> necessary." <br /> The interconnection exemptions include an exemption from inter-connecting low density <br /> developments (less than 2 units/acre) where an interconnection would fail to provide future <br /> benefits of alternative access at a major roadway intersection or along a major roadway. <br /> • Updates gate location/separation criteria. <br /> • Updates a traffic-related term in Chapter 910. <br /> F:\Community Development\Users\CurDev\BCC\2012 BCC\summaryofLDRs.doc CHME 2 6 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.