Laserfiche WebLink
MR. MARSH APOLOGIZED TO THE BOARD FOR NOT HAVING THIS <br />SCHEDULED REGULARLY ON THE AGENDA; IT WAS A STAFF OVERSIGHT, THUS <br />IT HAD TO BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA AT THE LAST MINUTE. HE CONTINUED <br />THAT THE REQUEST IS BROUGHT TO THE BOARD AS A RESPONSE TO THE DIRECTION <br />GIVEN BY THE BOARD BACK IN AUGUST OF THIS YEAR TO RECTIFY THE SHORT— <br />COMINGS NOTED IN THE MEMO DATED JUNE 19, 1980, AS FOLLOWS; <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />i� <br />DEPARTMENT <br />June 19, 1980 <br />'MEMO -, <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: David Marsh, Senior Planner <br />SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary 01at.Extension San Sebastian Springs, <br />Unit I <br />The staff has reviewed the tentative plat and the files and finds no <br />overriding reason to deny the requested extension. Preliminary approval <br />was granted February 21, 1979 <br />Jr <br />It should be noted, however,*that the slated 1-mprovements are estimated <br />to be approximately 50% complete.=..Other shortcomings found in our review <br />and inspection are as follows <br />1) Notes regarding filling in sensitive areas and sedimentation control <br />have not been placed on the plat. (Board of County Commission minutes <br />March 21, .1979) <br />2) It does not appear that the existing road alignment conforms to the <br />plat in some areas. <br />3) Culverts have been placed it different locations than that shown on <br />the plat (thereby creating problems with easement alignments). <br />4) Lot 31 has an existing slough through the center of the lot with no <br />easement. <br />5) Pavement of interior roads and 1/2 street on east property line have <br />not been.undertaken. <br />6) Extensive additional Swale and drainage work will be required. (Ex. <br />regrading, grassing or seed and mulch) <br />DM:jt <br />:45 <br />NOV 51980 <br />